implicit art

art and ecology, fiction and geek stuff, culture and philosophy, parenting and life, etc

implicit art

theory

Archives

08 October 2006 by nathaniel

Collecting Digits – The Upgrade!JHB + Digital Soiree Panel Discussion

As usual a thorough post from Christo on our last Upgrade!Joburg, via the atjoburg site:

The Collecting Digits Panel Discussion Oct 6th 2006
The Collecting Digits Panel at Wits Digital Arts. From left to right, Franci Cronje, Warren Siebrits, Nathaniel Stern, and Clive Kellner.

The first Upgrade! Johannesburg panel discussion brought together an exciting group of speakers to deal with the topic of “Collecting Digits – the challenges and obstacles to curating and selling digital art in South Africa.”

First to speak was Warren Siebrits – founder of one of Johannesburg’s most prestigious contemporary and modern commercial art galleries. Since he opened his gallery in 2002 with the landmark exhibition “States of Emergency”, Warren has consistently exhibited artists who are pushing the envelope in terms of new content and challenging forms. He spoke about the impact made on his personal development as a curator and gallery owner by his friendship with pioneering South African video artist Conrad Welz.
Using video art as the framework for his presentation, he traced the impact of significant events such as the First Johannesburg Biennale in 1995 on the uptake of video art by a younger generation of South African artists in the post-Apartheid years. Focusing in particular on the influence (and rivalry) of video artists Kendal Gears and Candice Breitz he spoke with enthusiasm of the impact made on him recently by Breitz’s six-channel installations, Mother and Father, in the White Cube Gallery in London. He confessed that this level of technological display would be unaffordable at any South African commercial gallery. Even the limited projections required by his Konrad Welz exhibition in 2005 had, he revealed, been a severe strain and the exhibition had run at a loss. This was compounded by the lack of enthusiasm exhibited by private buyers in South Africa for video art. Local buyers are “risk adverse” and their reluctance to pay rands for new forms of art such as video (let alone new media) has been a brake on the ambitions of gallery owners such as himself.

Clive Kellner – Director of the Johannesburg Art Gallery – spoke from the perspective of institutional galleries. Here the situation is more encouraging although the cost of technology continues to be a major obstacle. Although the largest gallery on the sub-continent, with a collection larger than the National Gallery in Cape Town, the JAG struggles to find fund the exhibition requirements of contemporary artists who, Clive commented, are continually raising the ante in terms of their exhibition requirements. The recent William Kentridge retrospective exhibition, he revealed, cost the JAG more than R1.4 million just to set up. However they were able to purchase 14 projectors for the retrospective which are now part of the Gallery’s pool of equipment available for future exhibitions.

With Clive at the helm, the JAG has taken a leading role in the purchse of innovative and important South African art. Their recent purchase of “Step Inside” the interactive work by Nathaniel Stern; and the two channel video, “Snow White” by Berni Searl. are examples of their committment.

Nathaniel Stern spoke from the perspective of a practicing artist who is particularly concerned with the relationship between traditional and new media. He describes his work as a “series of provocations” which have explored this relationship in a range of media and are in several public and private collections. Since his interactive work, “Step Inside” has just been bought by the JAG has was able to describe the complexities of the sale to the Upgrade audience. Unlike the examples in the previous presentations, which had been dominated by the paradigm of video art, “Step Inside” is a digital work with a complex combination of installation requirements and computer-software. Nathaniel revealed that the sale had been delayed by the announcement of the new “Intel” Apple Macs. Originally written for the PowerMAc processor, the Step Inside package was held back until the new platform was available and the software could be adapted accordingly. According to Nathaniel there are various strategies the digital artist can take towards the inevitable obsolescence of the platform originally used for the work. The work may be sold together with the hardware in a complete package. The problem with this approach is that hardware and software require maintenance – with the passage of time this becomes increasingly difficult. The other approach is to sell the concept ie to outline the logic of the work’s operation in pseudo code so that future programmers can replicate the process in whatever programming environment is then available. He demonstrated how the package which he had sold to the JAG utilized both of these strategies. Nathaniel provided both locked and unlocked Max/MSP-Jitter patches and a pseudo-code version. In addition, Nathaniel’s agreement with the Gallery specified that the work would be updated at specified intervals. All attempts to keep the work functional into the future.

Finally, Franci Cronje, herself a video artist and curator of several collections & competitions, including Sasol New Signatures, spoke from the perspective also informed by her own academic research into the topic. As curator of the important Sasol competition, she revealed that 26 out of the 110 works on the final exhibition were new media. (By new media she meant works that went through electronic mediation at some stage in the production process, therefore included video and digital prints.) Despite the high-tech status of their sponsor, the New Signatures exhibition struggled with the cost of projection technology. In the end they had to build a “black box”, essentially a small projection space, where the videos selected for the exhibition were shown in rotation. Artists who could afford to provide their own projectors were privileged with their own displays. All in all this was not a satisfactory situation, Franci admitted, and in many ways this approach handicapped the disadvantaged artists on the competition. For future competitions, she hoped to find funding to support a wider range of projections. Franci ended by making an appeal to the younger generation of digital artists to find place in the system. Digits are flexible and can go anywhere. It is up to digital artists to find those ways.

Posted in art, art and tech, franci cronje, me, pop culture, re-blog tidbits, reviews, south african art, stimulus, technology, theory, uncategorical ·

Archives

06 October 2006 by nathaniel

This Afternoon / Evening’s Events Reminder

15:00
Panel Discussion: Collecting Digits
VENUE: WSOA Digital Arts, Wits University
www.atjoburg.net/upgrade for map and details

This panel and discussion on the possibilities and problems with collecting new media art will include presentations by:

  • Warren Siebrits – founder of one of Johannesburg’s most prestigious contemporary and modern commercial art galleries
  • Franci Cronje – curator of several collections & competitions, including Sasol New Signatures
  • Nathaniel Stern – digital and interactive artist, in several public & private collections
  • Clive Kellner – Director of the Johannesburg Art Museum


18:00 for 18:30
SAartsEmerging 2006 Official opening
VENUE: The Bag Factory
10 Mahlatini Stree, Fordburg, Johannesburg
Take Jeppe past Museum Africa and it becomes Mahlatini
Opening by Nathaniel Stern

The Bag Factory presents SAartsEmerging 2006, an exhibition and series of events based on the website saartsemerging.org, Since January 2006 the website has featured a new artist every third Friday of each month. In celebration of our first year we will be holding an exhibition and a series of related events revolving around the state of emerging arts in South Africa.

The exhibition and events will be featuring the following South African artists, curators and arts personalities. These individuals include Lester Adams, Colleen Alborough, Doung Anwar Jahangeer, Christo Doherty, Shane de Lange, Stephan Erasmus, Ismail Farouk, Simon Gush, Dean Henning and Rike Sitas, Bronwyn Lace, Hannes Olivier, Abrie Fourie, Gordon Froud, Vaughn Sadie, Nathaniel Stern, Johan Thom, Rat Western, Storm Janse van Rensburg and Asha Zero.

Posted in art, art and tech, me, pop culture, re-blog tidbits, south african art, stimulus, technology, theory, uncategorical ·

Archives

02 October 2006 by nathaniel

the Upgrade! Johannesburg presents our first Panel Discussion: Collecting Digits

the Upgrade! Johannesburg presents our first Panel Discussion: Collecting Digits

Friday October 6, 2006 @ 3pm:
Panel Discussion: Collecting Digits
WSOA Digital Arts. Map: http://digitalarts.wits.ac.za/artworks/contact/map.htm

This panel and discussion on the possibilities and problems with collecting new media art will include presentations by:

  • Warren Siebrits – founder of one of Johannesburg’s most prestigious contemporary and modern commercial art galleries
  • Franci Cronje – curator of several collections & competitions, including Sasol New Signatures
  • Nathaniel Stern – digital and interactive artist, in several public & private collections
  • Clive Kellner – Director of the Johannesburg Art Museum

About Upgrade! Johannesburg
About once per month a group of new media students, artists and curators gather in Johannesburg, South Africa. At each meeting one or two artists present work – theirs, or a favorite’s – in order to foster critique, dialogue and collaboration in our growing digital arts scene. The Upgrade! Joburg grew out of Professor Christo Doherty’s (WSOA Digital Arts; Map ) regular Friday ‘Digital Soirees’ at Wits School of the Arts, and artist Nathaniel Stern’s atjoburg initiative, both founded between 2002/3 and still ongoing. They wanted to invite a larger, participative audience into their space, and be plugged into a more diverse and international network. Our first official Upgrade! featured Daniel Hirschmann, a South African Wits alumnus who also studied at NYU’s Interactive Telecommunications Program, and went on to help shape the Physical Computing studio at Fabrica. At number two, Stern presented MTAA’s brilliant work remotely (with their permission), rather fitting given their initial involvement in the first NYC Upgrades….

http://atjoburg.net/upgrade/

Posted in art, art and tech, franci cronje, me, south african art, stimulus, technology, theory, uncategorical ·

Archives

22 September 2006 by nathaniel

don’t believe the hype / believe the hype

So I went to the Ed Young / Christian Nerf ‘no problem in Africa’ DIVA talk at Wits yesterday and I have a secret to tell you: the bad boys of Cape Town aren’t that bad. In fact, they are charming, engaged, and extremely laid back. Now, truth be told, I already knew that about Christian – having briefly shared a studio with him downtown, we’d often have long chats about various, crit each other’s work and shoot the sh!t around ideas. He’s a fantastic guy, a great artist, and a generous thinker – I can’t say enough good things about him. But Christian, despite his work being funny and provocative and out of the norm, doesn’t really play into, out of, or care about, the public eye. He just ‘does’.

See, then there’s Ed.

Well, yeh. The guy has pissed off lots of people, said and done some stuff that gets people upset – and I do see why.

But to watch these two guys, I gotta say, you really have to like them… and by ‘them’ I mean their project. In isolation, some of the work may seem silly, and more than one commenter to me stated that they wished they could "get paid to party and tour Africa and drink beer" (me too). But hearing and seeing their discourse in near-entirety, internalizing their work methods and their continual questioning / disappointment, smiling through their lax attitudes vs the Spectacular art, it really starts to gel. Their performance is a kind of an inverted Wayne Barker – on so many levels – and if I have to explain this to you, I don’t think you’d get it (you’d have to spend some time with the guy). It’s a sociopolitical m9ndf@kc, where Ed probably says more about the egos of the art world than we are comfortable with, and Christian brings it up to the American-driven capitalist project – and the complicity or enactments of SA during and Post-Apartheid – on a macro scale.

I don’t make art like these guys, and I’ve never wanted to. But there is great value to what they are doing, and it is definitely going somewhere. We may not know where that is, and they don’t  seem to know where that is either, but since when – especially in the contemporary art world –  does ‘no product’ mean ‘unproductive’?

I realize I haven’t said much about the work itself, but we all know there’s more than enough info and press out there on these characters, and even more forthcoming with their current funded projects, so there’s not need for more. I’m just saying it’s worth paying attention.

PS And  yes, as per my above comment, I told them they should put together a catalogue or large show to contextualize in just such a way as I had the pleasure to experience… Ed says he’s working on a catalogue, and Nerf is working with Kathryn Smith on other texts for upcoming exhibitions. I recommend checking these out when they are on offer.

Posted in art, pop culture, reviews, south african art, stimulus, theory, uncategorical ·

Archives

19 September 2006 by nathaniel

The Collision Project

the collision project - marx and loveday

The Collision Project is the result of a collaborative exchange between artist / director Gerhard Marx and composer Clare Loveday, lecturers at the Wits School of Arts. It combines the visual and theatrical skills of Marx with the compositional exploration of Loveday to create a haunting work that is both concert performance, theatrical experience and installation work.
 
The Collision Project plays with the principles on which both classical and traditional string instruments function; in this case however, the vibration of strings are transferred into the body of a car wreck through cello and violin fragments grafted onto the car.  The strings and musical intervention serves to animate through sound, and to explore in the manner that vibration and consequently hearing is used to ‘see’ that which the eye cannot; scientific vibration based practices to explore the geological structures buried in rock, the child not yet born (sonar), the tapping of train wheels to detect fractures, the car’s past embedded in the rusty folds of its current form. It is a collision between aesthetic disciplines, between makers and approaches. But it is the actual collision; the event in the body of the wreck itself, which Marx and Loveday aims to explore in this piece of ‘forensic music’, by drawing a voice from the hollow body of an abandoned car.
 
Performed by Vusi Ndebele, Sisekelo Pila and Barry Sherman.
 
THE SUBSTATION, Wits East Campus, Braamfontein
Thursday 21 to Friday 29 September 2006 at 19h00
Book at Computicket
Enquiries 011.717.1376
pisantic@theatre.wits.ac.za

 
Limited Seating Available

Posted in art, art and tech, music, south african art, stimulus, technology, theory, uncategorical ·

Archives

17 September 2006 by nathaniel

Andre SC @ Upgrade! Joburg

Christo Doherty writes lyrical about Andre’s performance (via atjoburg):

The featured artist at this month’s Upgrade! at Wits Digital Arts was Andre SC (André S Clements), a new media manipulator and self-confessed “pixel maniac” who has recently begun exploring an approach to image processing which he calls “post-digital abstraction”.

Andre Clements ACAndré - Self Portrait
André Clements at the Digital Soiree/Upgrade . . . . and, “Andre SC”- self-portrait as post digital abstraction.

Andre studied design at Pretoria University and graduated with a BA degree in 1995. Since then he has worked as a designer, corporate consultant, and experimental artist. Over this period he has managed to find time for further studies in Computer Science and Psychology, and indeed several psychological concepts inform his thinking about art and technology. Most recently he has been lecturing in Media Design Technology at a local commercial college and also acts as web-editor/developer for David Krut the fine art publishers. He keeps his own blog at www.pixelplexus.co.za.

A love of abstraction runs through all his works. The different phases of his work are characterised by the different technical approaches he has developed towards his subject matter. “Being is not an exact thing” for André; and abstraction is a way of exploring the fluid and incomplete nature of visual experience, Most of his raw images are harvested from the web, using different search techniques; but his most recent works are based on more focused samples, frequently drawing on images created by other South African artists. “Untitled Kentridge ” started with fifty Kentridge prints superimposed and then mathematically averaged. Taking the process further, André ended up with an image created from 192 Kentridge prints. (Below). It is typical of André’s ethical approach towards image appropriation that after he had completed the series he phoned up the artist himself to ask his permission to make the images public. Kentridge kindly agreed but requested an artist’s proof of the print for his own collection.

kentridge abstracted

André also revealed that he lost all his pre-prepared material the previous evening when his laptop crashed, and had worked through the night to put another presentation together. As he started his presentation, his qualities of rigour/obsessiveness and playfulness/control became apparent. As suggested by the title of his presentation, “drawing the pixel curtain”, André’s aesthetic is founded on the smallest subdivision of the digital image. Many of the algorithms that he has constructed for his imaging processes engage at the pixel level.

André had gone to great lengths to prepare the venue for his presentation. Assisted by one of his MDT students, he rigged display lines along the walls of the room and hung a temporary exhibition of his lamda prints around the room. After publishing to the web, printing, specifically lambda printing, is his major output. Most of his digital processing concludes with a series of lambda prints, several of which were displayed at the soiree. André describes his relationship with the lamda technology as a “love affair” because of the brilliant colours and edge-to-edge precision which is possible with the laser technology.

Some of the earliest work which André discussed was inspired by his interest in the relationship between the human form (specifically the naked female form) and automated techniques of representation. For him, these works seek to create “a bridge between the very abstract and the very intimate”. The difficulty of finding live models led him to use the web as a source of raw images. Typical works from this period begin with a Google image search and then use algorithms to process the collected images into a single composite abstraction such as in “Porn Princess” (below).

porn princess

A chance encounter with curator Gordon Froud let to an invitation to participate in the “Porn Again” group exhibition at Merely Mortal gallery in Craighall. Froud’s 2005 exhibition gathered together a range of works by artists examining the presence of the erotic and the pornographic in contemporary fine art in South Africa. The experience of the exhibition stimulated AC’s curiosity about the dynamics of the local art scene and pushed his tendency towards abstraction even further. His next phase of work made use of algorithms that upsized web images to 400 dpi and further. By now, AC’s style of production was taking characteristic form. Images are collected and subjected to various pre-processing. The actual abstraction is a process that can take between 5 – 6 hours. A “continuous dance”, as André describes it, between himself, the images and the computer.

More recently, André has encountered Nathaniel Stern’s Compressionism and was excited by the American artist’s “hacking of conventional recording technology “, such as scanners, in order to create new kinds of imagery. André simply used this desktop scanner and experimented with his own “compressionist” images, moving objects across the plate in synchronisation with the progress of the scanner. Still life reminiscent of synthetic cubism and even lighter fluid fires on the scanner plate were all grist for his experiments with the form.

Finally, André briefly introduced his most recent work, a generative web-based project entitled “netVerse”.
A simple interface allows users to play with a stream of falling words which can be clicked and arranged into poetic arrangements much like fridge magnet poetry. The distinctive aspect of the interface is that it records each decision made by the user and then displays the additions for the next user. At this stage over 3500 words have been placed on the system and André plans to add more computational intelligence to the application to control the fall of words.

Posted in art, art and tech, creative commons, poetry, pop culture, re-blog tidbits, reviews, south african art, stimulus, technology, theory, uncategorical ·
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

Tags

aesthetics alice wilds art artist feature avant-garde books briefiew coding comics concern culture digital studio drawing ecology engineering fantasy fiction goods for me google ilona andrews jon horvath kate daniels milwaukee mo gawdat nathaniel stern paduak philosophy public property reading review sean slemon self-enjoyment Steve Martin syllabus sharing teaching technology TED TEDx trees urban fantasy web-comics webcomics whitehead world after us writing

nathaniel’s books

Interactive Art and Embodiment book cover
Interactive Art and Embodiment: the implicit body as performance

from Amazon.com

Buy Interactive Art for $30 directly from the publisher

Ecological Aesthetics book cover
Ecological Aesthetics: artful tactics for humans, nature, and politics

from Amazon.com

All content © 2026 by implicit art. Base WordPress Theme by Graph Paper Press