Art Connect
Implicit Art gets a thoughtful and good review on Art Connect. It’s rare to see so much time taken to reflect what makes a good blog, or a good art site, and this space does both. Check it.
Implicit Art gets a thoughtful and good review on Art Connect. It’s rare to see so much time taken to reflect what makes a good blog, or a good art site, and this space does both. Check it.
I have quite a bit of blog catching up to do – lots going on over here that I’d love to share – but have been a bit snowed under. Here’s one reason why:
I JUST SUBMIT MY 286-page PHD DISSERTATION. Like, less than a minute ago. No sh!t.
Slightly anti-climactic, and there’s still a defense and any edits they give me before I am “Dr. Stern.” But mostly, it feels good.
That’s right. The co-founder of Wikipedia has joined the Facebook Group for Wikipedia Art.
How’s that for some credibility? If only these guys agreed (still marked for deletion).
The group. Or click image to see that he is a member – this is for real, people.
Lots of cool edits to the page – see the history as well.
Huge debate roaring as well. My favorite quote here (followed by mini argument) is by Wikipedia user “shmeck,” aka contemporary artist Shane Mecklenburger:
KEEP The Wikipedia Art page is a self-aware example of Wikipedia’s mission of collective epistemology. It enacts and exposes Wikipedia’s own strengths, weaknesses, potential, and limits as a system of understanding and as a contemplative object of beauty. The page is also a self-aware example of the strengths, weaknesses, potential, and limits of new media art as a an object of contemplation. New media art is an example of how the boundaries between art and every other discipline from epistemology to microbiology disintegrated (see interdisciplinarity) in the 21st Century. This page is an example of how a Wikipedia page can go beyond simply existing as a Wikipedia page, while retaining its basic utilitarian Wikipedia function. Those who care most about Wikipedia’s mission would probably agree that Wikipedia already is a collaborative art form. If you feel that Wikipedia is a beautiful thing, then at some level (whether or not you admit it) you consider Wikipedia an art form, with its own codes and conventions. This is an example of something that explains art, explores art, and is art all at the same time. Deleting this page would be a statement that the exegesis of conceptual art and/or new media art has no place in Wikipedia, except on the tired, lifeless, and opaque conceptual art and new media art pages. Why shouldn’t a tiny, obscure corner of Wikipedia-brand collective epistemology be preserved for an instructive, self-referential, and ever-changing living example of what an art object can be in the 21st Century? Should this page be judged invalid only because it refers to itself? This artwork can only exist as a Wikipedia page that refers to itself. Therefore, deleting would not only send the message “this is not Wikipedia”; it would also be saying “this is not art.” comment added by Shmeck (talk • contribs) 00:27, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
++++ The above is a wonderful commentary, but Wikipedia is not your web page to wax eloquently about what you think ought to exist. Bus stop (talk) 00:34, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
—- UPDATED, more nice stuff
Merry Christmakkah! Happy new year!
The turkey is defrosting (mmmm, bourbon basting), Sidonie stayed up late (for a two year old) last night eating chocolate and playing with her new doll house from her ouma (OMG I have the cutest daughter ever), and I have little bit of morning to pound out a blog on what will probably be the only full day off I take this year (OK, OK, I already spent 30 mins on my dissertation when I first woke up, but the thing has to get done, right? Wait, is blogging ‘work’?).
So for my Tops of 2008: A Different Kind of Year in Review, I’ve decided to go with four different Top 5 lists: The Top 5 people I newly met in 2008, The Top 5 people I’d like to meet because of what they did (or the work I saw from them) in 2008, The Top 5 exhibitions for me (what I found most enjoyable), and The Top 5 shows I wish I had seen, but didn’t. Hope you like it! Feel free to comment, leaving any things/people I missed but might (or should have) enjoy(ed)!
The Top 5 people I newly met in 2008
Top 5 people I’d like to meet because of what they did (or the work I saw from them) in 2008
The Top 5 exhibitions for me (what I found most enjoyable)
The Top 5 shows I wish I had seen, but didn’t

Construction for 'Return' (Conductor), 2008, Steel, black paint, Two identical figures, each c. 61 x 61 x 33cm
Dude, I forgot how long proper blogging takes. That’s all I got. Happy Holidays!!!!
h/t Seodin O’Sullivan