implicit art

art and ecology, fiction and geek stuff, culture and philosophy, parenting and life, etc

implicit art

theory

Archives

12 May 2008 by nathaniel

getaway experiment @ artthrob

Marcus Neustetter and my net.art project / turbulence commission circa 2005, getawayexperiment.net, has been written up on the project page for artthrob this month, by their newly appointed new media editor, Chad Rossouw. Link.

First, a congratulations to Chad on his new position – I’ve read some of his writings and know he can be very thoughtful and interesting, and I’m glad to have his expertise covering and furthering new media art in South Africa.

I was admittedly surprised to see getawayexperiment.net reviewed by artthrob (again). Not only is it a relatively older work – by net.art standards, anyhow… although, in fairness, it is currently on web exhibition at Greylock Arts in the states, so I can see why Chad came across it and may have wanted to give it some attention now – but it was also already written about, more extensively, on Artthrob’s project page in Feb 2005, by Carine Zaayman. I know Ed Young may have started this trend when he decided he needed to let SAartsEmerging know how much they now suck after a good first year (Ed maintains this original goodness before the suckiness, and this site was also first more positively covered by Zaayman on the same page as Ed’s review – and also a site I used to be involved with; Linda Stupart’s adjoining bloggy piece, around Art Heat’s conception time, is worth mentioning here, too…), but if it’s not a new work you want to write about – and especially because the work has not changed, as opposed to in Ed’s case – then at least a little nod and link to Carine’s original (and much longer and more positive) review by Chad could have been included (Ed fails here, too; and is less generous than either Chad or Carine; and also oddly claims the site is easy to ignore while simultaneously writing the third artthrob piece about it). They are all in the same publication after all, so an ongoing discussion would be appropriate. (Those are some long sentences there, with lots of parenthetical thoughts in both brackets and dashes. Sorry, that’s just how it goes some times….)

All that being said, I can’t deny that Chad’s criticism has merit. While I stand by the strength of both the concept and its resulting pages for getawayexperiment.net (and Chad seems to like this, too), I think that the lack of a large number of participating artists uploading their own images once the work was launched comes precisely from the fact that the world the piece creates is extremely idiosyncratic – his point. While I don’t generally think this necessarily a bad thing in the art world, this particular piece is meant to be both about participation and empowerment, and so while it represents those concepts well, as an interactive work, it does not initiate them, in the literal sense, as much as it could.

I think the piece, overall, is successful in creating various dialogues around these issues, as is evidenced by these two texts, and another by Eduardo Navas. But I appreciate Chad’s fair review and feedback when it comes to getawayexperiment.net‘s shortcomings, and am looking forward to more of the same from him – whether about my own work, or those of other South African artists.

Posted in art, art and tech, carine zaayman, creative commons, me, pop culture, re-blog tidbits, reviews, south african art, stimulus, technology, theory ·

Archives

01 May 2008 by nathaniel

DATA 30

Fantastic DATA on Tuesday with Alessandro Ludovico (Italy), Jaime Villarreal (Mexico), Ivan Twohig (Ireland).

Ivan showed several projects including his Falling Man, which turned free 3D graphics of a falling man into life-size paper sculptures throughout a gallery. Alessandro showed his Google Will Eat Itself and Amazon Noir, and Jaime did a live networked performance with junk and micro-controllers, making music in real-time with his friends in Mexico while here in Dublin.

Heaps of photos here. A few samples:

See more photos.

Posted in art, art and tech, flickr, Ireland Art, pop culture, stimulus, technology, theory ·

Archives

10 April 2008 by nathaniel

Printmaking Today (and a minor kvetch)

My hard drive died last week, which sucked. I didn’t lose anything important like art or my PhD (thank goodness), but it’s taken days just to get back to running, due to file and email jumbles on various drives, etc (still not quite there, and will have some crazy organizing to do in my spare time – files everywhere! – over the next few months…).

Anyhow, lost somewhere in the gambit was this 2-page feature on David Krut projects – featuring li’l ole me! – in Printmaking Today magazine…

Read it.

Posted in art, art and tech, inbox, Links, me, reviews, south african art, stimulus, technology, theory ·

Archives

10 April 2008 by nathaniel

Paddy Johnson interviews Aron Namenwirth of artMovingProjects

Fantastic interview here. Snippet:

Two years ago Caitlin Jones observed in NYFA Current that net artists working in multiple formats were increasingly finding venues to show. Today, the art world is still figuring out how to manage the practicalities of dealer and artist relationships. I spoke with Aron Namenwirth, of artMovingProjects, in an effort to better understand the challenges, and solutions, digital media presents to contemporary galleries with a focus on New Media. – Paddy Johnson

One topic that’s come up on Rhizome’s blog is the rematerialization of art (the idea, according to Ed Halter, “that innovations such as the flat-screen monitor, the digital print, and the editioned DVD, have helped transform immaterial forms like video and net.art into a new generation of physical, sellable objects”), so I wanted to talk to you about this a little. Is it critical to display new media art in the gallery?

I think new media art, like old media, needs a physical place for critical and social discourse. On the computer screen in the privacy of your home, you can do research, and email other professionals on the merits of a piece, but it’s not the same as looking at it in a real space, walking around it, and experiencing it. A lot of new media work requires interaction, and that interaction is mediated by the spectator and the user together.

optidisc.jpg

Tom Moody, OptiDisc, 2007 (Installation at artMovingProjects)

It seems to me that there’s a lot to be said for going into a space, and experiencing that work with someone else too. A dialog can occur, that, as you mention, is more spontaneous. Which I think can be important for new media, particularly because the bias of the medium is “cold.”

Of course, the beauty of some new media art projects is that you can view it anytime you want online.

Right, which presumably has its pluses and minuses for dealers. I know you have been working on a contract between the artist and gallery. I thought maybe we could discuss some of these details a little, because I imagine they’re really important to both artists and dealers.

Sure. The contract I’ve drawn up is an agreement between the artist and artMovingProjects. It’s binding for the life of the working relationship between artist and the gallery, and that’s actually how the document starts. The stipulation is for one piece of the artist’s oeuvre — and that’s what’s so different about it than other gallery contracts. Typically, the contract between the artist and the gallery represents all the artist’s work, and ties the artist to the gallery. In this case, the artist is free to work for many different venues simultaneously, which is a real plus.

Well, there are examples of independently working artists in traditional mediums that seem to do okay, but it is very rare.

Yes, and this is very specifically tied to the intellectual content. It stipulates that the artwork will only be sold with permission of the gallery at the agreed piece in perpetuity….With editions, and video, the dealers typically increase the price of the edition as it is sold, and I feel that that’s not such a great idea in the short term because it creates undue pressure on the collector. Also, part of the contract stipulates that any deals the artist makes outside the agreement involving others will not be supported by the gallery without authorization in writing. Further, should the artwork be sold without permission in writing this will end the relationship between the artist and the gallery.

To read the full piece click here.

Posted in art, art and tech, creative commons, Links, pop culture, re-blog tidbits, research, stimulus, technology, theory, uncategorical ·

Archives

09 February 2008 by nathaniel

Obama vs. the Phobocracy

“… in the name of preserving hope do we disdain it. That is how a phobocracy maintains its grip on power.”

This is a moving and wonderful article that every American should read before they go to the polls. Chabon, who wrote one of my favorite books of all time, nails it when he explains away the reasons people give to vote for Hillary over Barrack.

read it

Posted in news and politics, pop culture, re-blog tidbits, stimulus, theory ·

Archives

30 January 2008 by nathaniel

Simulate Editions at Ten Cubed Gallery, Second Life

Simulate Editions
unique and authenticated virtual art objects

Premiering at:
Crossing the Void II
Ten Cubed Gallery, Second Life
opening receptions 31 January 7pm EST (1pm SLT) and 1 February 7pm GMT (8am SLT)
SLURL: http://slurl.com/secondlife/depo%20park%201/200/55/22

Simulate Editions

Artists Scott Kildall and Nathaniel Stern have each been exploring performance and performativity in their archival prints. Kildall restages then remediates iconic performance artworks in Second Life, and Stern straps on a scanner appendage and battery pack, and performs images into existence; both processes produce art objects in the real world.

For Crossing the Void II at Ten Cubed Gallery – Haydn Shaughnessy’s new virtual space designed by New York architect Benn Dunkley – they were asked to produce unique virtual art works for sale in Second Life, which mirror their real life prints. In response, they created a series of “Simulate Editions”, where every ‘print’ is individually signed and numbered by hand, making each work ‘technically unique.’ The works are copy and modification protected, but also come with a resize script, so that the new collector/owner – and only them – can grow or shrink their purchase so as to fit into their SL space.

In addition to Kildall and Stern, also on the exhibition are Chris Ashley, Jon Coffelt and Claire Keating.

Simulate Editions

Posted in art, art and tech, Compressionism, Ireland Art, pop culture, south african art, stimulus, technology, theory ·
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

Tags

aesthetics alice wilds art artist feature avant-garde books briefiew coding comics concern culture digital studio drawing ecology engineering fantasy fiction goods for me google ilona andrews jon horvath kate daniels milwaukee mo gawdat nathaniel stern paduak philosophy public property reading review sean slemon self-enjoyment Steve Martin syllabus sharing teaching technology TED TEDx trees urban fantasy web-comics webcomics whitehead world after us writing

nathaniel’s books

Interactive Art and Embodiment book cover
Interactive Art and Embodiment: the implicit body as performance

from Amazon.com

Buy Interactive Art for $30 directly from the publisher

Ecological Aesthetics book cover
Ecological Aesthetics: artful tactics for humans, nature, and politics

from Amazon.com

All content © 2026 by implicit art. Base WordPress Theme by Graph Paper Press