implicit art

art and ecology, fiction and geek stuff, culture and philosophy, parenting and life, etc

implicit art

theory

Archives

07 October 2005 by AJ

So this is a commitment to freedom ?

Tectonic has a story running about Steve Balmer meeting with the Deputy President. This is a very disconcerting thing, and unsurprizingly the editor Alistair, a man I’ve known for many years, atacks it with zest. In fact in all the years I have known Alistair I have never read him being so forthright before.
I sent him a mail in private with praise for the piece, but considdering it’s relevance to free and open-source software as well as to related ideas like free culture, I felt it worth giving him a plug here. Artists have as much too fear from deals like this as programmers do – and we ought to be on the same side after all (and I say this as somebody who considders myself to be both of the above).

Posted in AJ Venter, theory, uncategorical ·

Archives

27 September 2005 by kaganof

giant steps


tonight, tuesday 27 september, at 7pm, museum africa, 121 bree street, newtown, it’s the world premiere, all visitors to nathaniel’s blog are welcome to attend. if you can’t make it watch the broadcast by sabc1 on monday night at 10pm, 3 october.

Posted in kaganof, music, news and politics, poetry, pop culture, south african art, theory ·

Archives

19 September 2005 by sean slemon

New York Galleries

Hi there
This blog is primarily going to track my visits and experiences within the New York Art scene. I have just begun a Masters degree in fine art at Pratt Institute, and given that I am new here I am making an effort of spending at least one or half a day each week, looking at contemporary galleries and the artists they represent, and more importantly at what they are doing in their work.
I will be looking at museums as well and also artists I find that of interest to me that may not be showing. I will also include write ups of artists that have been referred to me in my studies and why.

My first trip into Chelsea was pretty good. I was overwhelmed by the galleries and the sheer amount of them. Also by the amount of bad or second grade work that is out there and being presented as well. As one wonders: “How do these galleries keep going?” I’ll tell you when I find out.

So please respond and comment as you see fit. I am just exploring and I am not reviewing. These are my opinions and thoughts. I am not attempting to critique the work, except for my own reasons, which is simply to explore artists in New York and what they are doing right now.
I will list places by either gallery or artist or both. Most of these galleries or artists can be tracked down via google and some of the galleries sites have good links to the artists and their work.

Axis Gallery-Sam Nlengethwa
I visited the Axis Gallery run by Gary van Wyck. He is a South African and he and his wife, own and run a gallery that represents mainly SA artists. He is currently showing Sam Nlengethwa who is showing some silkscreen prints of simply coloured portraits of township life. His gallery space is really nice-open , airy and lofty and there are other galleries in his building too. He also deals in African artifacts as well and that seems to be the moneymaker for him. The gallery though has found it hard to educate Americans about both African and South African artists. He says that it is one of a million cultures that are readily available in NY and this I can understand. Everything is available here. Gary is generous and kind and I will be seeing him soon again.

Nicola Di Caprio- Silence is Sexy
BUIA Gallery
One of the nicer tongue in check shows I saw.
The space was clad with fake green grass at the entrance, with golf balls and putts standing against the wall. A record player sits on the ground spinning a single disk with a small hand, cocked as if a gun spinning and so pointing around the room.
Further down were several large thin paintings, which I later realized, were the edges of Cds. I liked that- a kind of over grown Cd collection. On later research I saw that she has done this with photographs a lot. I prefer the paintings. They are more sculptural and I think that painting is kind of dead and bland on most levels and it only really comes alive when it gets into other realms.

Sol Lewitt @ Paula Cooper Gallery.
Well if you know Sol Lewitt then you wont be surprised. But to my surprise we had someone in our seminar the other day who didn’t know him and was about to make his paintings so we sent her off to find him. Having said that they were very nice-drawings on paper both big and small with different colours. Flat colour painted as wash and then fat wavy lines that touch each other painted horizontally in ink. I would have found one painting like this very compelling, but he had several and they became very boring as a result. There was also a small steel sculpture which consisted of rectangular plate pieces flat on the floor to form a circular pattern-small in the centre and getting bigger as it goes out. I though he had lost it. It’s not that amazing and it’s not that compelling.

Mark Dion @ Tanya Danaker Gallery
He only had one work, which was part of a group show. It was a small terrarium ( self contained planter) made of glass and aluminium, built to look a bit like a trolley or wheelbarrow. The sides were clad with blue china looking porcelain tiles with birds drawn on them. I kind of thought it was badly made at first. I always look at the production and manufacture of such things.
It was badly welded and the glass ill fitting. When this happens it becomes distracting and more about the way it’s made than what is being said. But I did get further though. I began to think about the plant and how it related to New York that is a city struggling for space- so the idea of a portable/ moveable planter is very apt. One also thinks of things like what happens if the plant grows tall? and does it need water? I am going to do some reading on this later. I am interested in this man because I have just made a work using a plant and I feel that I may be dealing similar kinds of interrogations. The plant in a city like this can be dealt with in bizarre manners.
Another woman to look at who also makes terrariums is Paula Hayes. She has a website. She used to be an artist, and made backpacks which were terrariums-you could see the inner workings of the plants and also the tubes and source of water as well. There was something strange about having to carry around your plant on your back. Kind of like a pet- like the tiny dogs they have that they stuff in their handbags or just under the seat.

Chris Hanson and Hendrika Sonnenberg
Cohan and Leslie Gallery
This is the best work I have seen so far in NY. It is very well made sculpture that is sublime. It responds to its area and is simply beautiful.
They make life size replicas of urban things we see everyday like chain link fence, a bicycle chained to a pole, a street side rubbish bin and a trolley. The catch is that they make them very very accurately out of carved or extruded poly-foam. They actually make all the components for the bike, life size and glue them together. This need to recreate your local environment is a trend at present and seems to have been for some time. They have chosen soothing colours-baby blue and avocado green to work in and the sculptures are amazing. Being in the city the need to look at urban landscape is also very prevalent. These are also scenes that are specific to NY and I noticed them as a difference when I first arrived. Of course artists like these two, tend to make work, which stems from the locally unusual, but which has become the norm in context, which is an entire other discourse in itself that I will be exploring at soon. Local people often wont see this kind of thing anymore and they may need some reminding.

I have more but will keep it for later. All these galleries were in Chelsea in Manhattan. I really recommend looking up the last write up for images, but of course to see it in the flesh is another altogether

Posted in art and tech, sean slemon, theory, uncategorical ·

Archives

13 September 2005 by nathaniel

Compressionism revisited

Compressionism, Compressionist study of tree
left: tree, 750 x 2000 mm, Sept. 2005 Compressionism is an ironic title for a series of works that use simple technologies to "capture and compress" subjects, then "edits and exhibits" them to explore different ways of looking. In the near future, I’ll play with video-based and sonic Compressionist studies; for now, I’ve been performing with a moving scanner and PhotoShop to produce the images – which I eventually turn into large-scale, archival prints. There’s some (video) documentation of the first experiments and their exhibition (April 2005, with Marcus Neustettter’s afterimages) here, and my latest studies (new ones finished today!) will henceforth be housed here. Compressionism grew out of serial faces, featured in Leonardo 38:3


Posted in art, art and tech, Compressionism, me, pop culture, south african art, theory ·

Archives

11 September 2005 by nathaniel

art | south africa is powerless

This post is probably related to this other post about the lack of reviews of emerging artists in joburg…

I can’t decide whether I find it amusing or enraging that in art | south africa’s big issue on “power and influence,” they’ve almost completely written themselves out. To quote Sean O’Toole’s (the editor’s) brief introduction:

Why embark on such a self-reflexive enquiry into power and influence? In his book, The Culture Game, Olu Oguibe remarks: “Ironically, the contemporary art ‘world’ is one of the last bastions of backwardness in the west today, which makes it an uneven playground, a formidable terrain of difficulty for artists whose backgrounds locate at the receiving end of intolerance.” Substitute the geographies – west for South Africa – and Oguibe’s statement retains a compelling significance. Of course, anyone who routinely engages the South African art world will know this already, that it is a formidable terrain of difficulty, one in which “institutions, patrons, brokers and promoters peddle not only art but careers, loyalties and fortunes of artists also,” to borrow a sharp statement from Oguibe.

Perhaps I am gambling my own fortune by playing with loyalties here, but is it not a disingenuous “self-reflexive enquiry” if Bell-Roberts, and more importantly, their magazine – art | south africa – are merely a footnote, a caveat, a sidebar? “What about Suzette and Brendon Bell-Roberts?…. it was decided to exclude the duo.” Aside from that statement lacking any agency (“mistakes were made!”), I’m more interested in why publications, and their editors, were left off this list. art | south africa is the only regular, high quality, international print publication in the country.

How much power do writers, gallerists or artists have without being seen in the public eye? art | south africa left out that they ask for, and/or refuse, columns both by and about everyone on their own (and everyone else’s) list. The mag is the (most) public face of our contemporary art, and with that comes power and influence.

Posted in news and politics, pop culture, south african art, theory ·

Archives

06 September 2005 by nathaniel

Artthrob and the south african arts media

I think it may have been yesterday that I posted the available job at artthrob. Admittedly, I’ve already heard a few comments about it (but none online), and just this morning I received an email from sculptor Sean Slemon (now overseas) on the rampage. Like myself – and many other South African artists – Sean was snubbed by Art South Africa, and mostly by artthrob, despite three solo shows and winning Sasol New Signatures. There is no doubt in my mind that the shows deserved and needed to be written about. For me, a writer had to basically beg to cover my solo show at the JAG for ArtSA, and a recent duo show with Marcus Neustetter was in neither publication, despite offers of writing from Colin Richards and James Sey – I don’t think I need to justify their talents as writers…. They were refused.

This is not simply a whiney, naive, “write about my art” complaint. We all know that there is bias, favoritism, etc, in every art scene. There is too much art to cover, and not enough writers. But there does need to be an effort of balance between artists, writers and editors. Right now, all the weight seems to be falling on the latter, and young and emerging artists (especially those not from Cape Town, where the base seems to be) are often left out. This is a problem widely discussed by young artists in Joburg (and elsewhere – for example, some of Andrew Lamprecht’s ending comments in artthrob), and if we want to open up this discussion beyond a very small, insular, hermetic group, then the editors need to take on board new writers, need to engage with their own decisions around who is being written about. I, among others, am asking for a true engagement with the spririt of critique, not just positive articles about the already known. Like our visual artists are oft asked to do, our writers and editors should be taking risks.

in the mail from Sean Slemon, quoted by his permission:

I saw you posted the ad for the Artthrob editor on your site…
I couldn’t help but get incensed about it because whoever becomes the editor needs to realize that their representation of Johannesburg reviews is dismal.
According to them there was only one show worth reviewing in Joburg last month!!!! ONE SHOW !!! [editor’s note: this is actually for the entirety of Gauteng.] There were plenty.
Yes I am upset because they didn’t review my show, and nor did Artsouthafrica either it seems. Even after staff from both publications made promises…

Just thought that this is and has been something of a debate in the South African art scene for some time now. These two publications have some strange crossovers in the people they employ which is problematic in that they are A-supposed to be competing to generate a dialogue, and B they employ some of the same people so where would the dialogue be if it existed. I think that these publications have a responsibility to South African artists and the artworld in general to review as much as they can and not only the shows of friends, or what they think is “suitable.” Flash art has piles of reviews, as do many other internationally acclaimed publications. Don’t not review a show just because the other one did. Thats how you start a dialogue. And this is not only about Arthrob or Artsouthafrica, this is also about the Mail and Guardian Friday section, and many other so called arts sections that never ever review shows that are very very good and deserve a review. [editor’s note: it seems that in the popular press, Die Beeld is the only paper that consistently covers exhibitions by both known and lesser-known artists; they pretty mucn trashed my JAG show, but I still appreciated the dialogue.]
….The selections of reviews are conservative at best….

I think I’ll leave the rest to those who know, those who want to make a difference, and those who disagree.

Posted in news and politics, pop culture, south african art, theory ·
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

Tags

aesthetics alice wilds art artist feature avant-garde books briefiew coding comics concern culture digital studio drawing ecology engineering fantasy fiction goods for me google ilona andrews jon horvath kate daniels milwaukee mo gawdat nathaniel stern paduak philosophy public property reading review sean slemon self-enjoyment Steve Martin syllabus sharing teaching technology TED TEDx trees urban fantasy web-comics webcomics whitehead world after us writing

nathaniel’s books

Interactive Art and Embodiment book cover
Interactive Art and Embodiment: the implicit body as performance

from Amazon.com

Buy Interactive Art for $30 directly from the publisher

Ecological Aesthetics book cover
Ecological Aesthetics: artful tactics for humans, nature, and politics

from Amazon.com

All content © 2026 by implicit art. Base WordPress Theme by Graph Paper Press