Super Tuesday’s results
Analysts examine Tuesday’s results – if Kerry has the minority vote, as the first analyst on this page says, then why are all of the analysts of color talking about Howard Dean?
iVote
and the primaries. OK, we know Dean is e-organized, so I don’t know how much
the ‘Dean win’ in this iVote actually tells us, but they make a very good case
about how much say the later primary states (don’t) have…
My vote in NY is still going for Dean
(my favorite candidate), but I do have to face the fact that he may not be our
Dem candidate in ’04. I took another look at some of the potential candidate sites…
Electability? Since when is Bush electable? We don’t need anyone that smart in
order to beat him in debate, do we? More important, who is going to stand up to
Corporate America, rebuild our foreign relations, get us work again? In the absence
of Howard Dean (pout), I urge readers to take another good look at recent state-winners
John Edwards and
Wesley Clark. Both are extremely
‘presidential;’ both are much better choices than John
Kerry. Don’t believe me? Take a gander at the provided links, and their respective
‘on the issues’ pages. Granted, Kerry is a lesser evil to Bush, but why not vote
for someone we want?
Extra point: both are southerners (southern vote = happy Democrat). Added bonus: perhaps Clark or Edwards would be willing to take on Dean as a VP…
