{"id":5295,"date":"2017-09-24T09:20:33","date_gmt":"2017-09-24T14:20:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nathanielstern.com\/blog\/?p=5295"},"modified":"2017-11-18T09:58:25","modified_gmt":"2017-11-18T15:58:25","slug":"briefiew-of-general-ecology-the-new-ecological-paradigm","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nathanielstern.com\/blog\/2017\/09\/24\/briefiew-of-general-ecology-the-new-ecological-paradigm\/","title":{"rendered":"Briefiew of General Ecology: The New Ecological Paradigm"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>I define an ecological approach<\/a> as one that takes account of agents, processes, thoughts, and relations. Humans and non-humans, matter and concepts, things and not-yet things, politics, economics, and industry, for example, are all actively shaped in, and as, their interrelation. And there is, according to Erich H\u00c3\u00b6rl in his great collection edited along with James Burton, General Ecology: The New Ecological Paradigm (2017<\/em><\/a>), \u00e2\u20ac\u0153hardly any area that cannot be considered the object of an ecology and thus open to ecological reformulation.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d These range in the thousands, he asserts, including \u00e2\u20ac\u0153ecologies of sensation, perception, cognition, desire, attention, power, values, information, participation, media, the mind, relations, practices, behavior, belonging, the social, [and] the political\u00e2\u20ac\u009d to name a fraction of those already called into action (1).<\/p>\n

The book brings together some of the most important thinkers of our time, across media and philosophy, feminism and communication, geology and literature, to have us reevaluate, in the words of Brian Massumi in his chapter on “Virtual ecology and the question of value,” our “orientational qualities of existence.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d What do we value, and why? Can we shift our appetites and propensities, our stylistic approaches, so as to aim, together, with our environments, towards better futures?<\/p>\n

Like most collections, this book is best digested slowly, rather than read all at once. I started with the introduction, jumped to Massumi’s chapter (among the authors, I am most familiar with his work), then back around to Stiegler, Parikka, Fuller and Goriunova, and more, and I’m still middling through several others. I’ll admit it is also surprising, and reassuring, to see so many media theorists and digital culture scholars asking us to think-with our everyday materials, what they do and are, and might become – and what we<\/em> should do as part of our engagements, and life.<\/p>\n

Simply, I love the framing of this book as a whole. It gives these wonderful thinkers the\u00c2\u00a0opportunity take different and new directions with their research, to push the boundaries of their own specificities, in order to show us how to approach ecology more generally. And, it’s under $30 (yes, I paid for mine; this is not a freeview). Recommended<\/em>.<\/p>\n