implicit art

art and ecology, fiction and geek stuff, culture and philosophy, parenting and life, etc

implicit art

pop culture

Archives

15 February 2009 by nathaniel

Jimmy Wales likes Wikipedia Art

That’s right. The co-founder of Wikipedia has joined the Facebook Group for Wikipedia Art.

How’s that for some credibility? If only these guys agreed (still marked for deletion).

The group. Or click image to see that he is a member – this is for real, people.

Facebook Group for Wikipedia: member name, Jimmy Wales

Facebook Group for Wikipedia: member name, Jimmy Wales

Posted in art, art and tech, creative commons, Ireland Art, Links, me, milwaukee art, news and politics, pop culture, re-blog tidbits, south african art, stimulus, technology, uncategorical ·

Archives

15 February 2009 by nathaniel

Wikipedia Art update (and updated)

Lots of cool edits to the page – see the history as well.

Huge debate roaring as well. My favorite quote here (followed by mini argument) is by Wikipedia user “shmeck,” aka contemporary artist Shane Mecklenburger:

KEEP The Wikipedia Art page is a self-aware example of Wikipedia’s mission of collective epistemology. It enacts and exposes Wikipedia’s own strengths, weaknesses, potential, and limits as a system of understanding and as a contemplative object of beauty. The page is also a self-aware example of the strengths, weaknesses, potential, and limits of new media art as a an object of contemplation. New media art is an example of how the boundaries between art and every other discipline from epistemology to microbiology disintegrated (see interdisciplinarity) in the 21st Century. This page is an example of how a Wikipedia page can go beyond simply existing as a Wikipedia page, while retaining its basic utilitarian Wikipedia function. Those who care most about Wikipedia’s mission would probably agree that Wikipedia already is a collaborative art form. If you feel that Wikipedia is a beautiful thing, then at some level (whether or not you admit it) you consider Wikipedia an art form, with its own codes and conventions. This is an example of something that explains art, explores art, and is art all at the same time. Deleting this page would be a statement that the exegesis of conceptual art and/or new media art has no place in Wikipedia, except on the tired, lifeless, and opaque conceptual art and new media art pages. Why shouldn’t a tiny, obscure corner of Wikipedia-brand collective epistemology be preserved for an instructive, self-referential, and ever-changing living example of what an art object can be in the 21st Century? Should this page be judged invalid only because it refers to itself? This artwork can only exist as a Wikipedia page that refers to itself. Therefore, deleting would not only send the message “this is not Wikipedia”; it would also be saying “this is not art.” comment added by Shmeck (talk • contribs) 00:27, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

++++ The above is a wonderful commentary, but Wikipedia is not your web page to wax eloquently about what you think ought to exist. Bus stop (talk) 00:34, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

  • Comment: Thanks, but isn’t that what everyone is doing here? Talking about what ought to exist on Wikipedia? You haven’t addressed a single one of my points.

—- UPDATED, more nice stuff

  • This sort of artwork already has strong precedents in history – the Surrealists’ Exquisite Corpse, Debord’s idea of Situationist detournement, and although I am not part of this collective, I fully intend to include it as part of my chapter for the upcoming book of distributed writing commissioned by Turbulence.org, and it will be mentioned as part of my talk on new art practices at a guest lecture at Denver University on 2/16/09, and I have already written on it on my critical blog in London. Therefore, the reference is to the emergence of the concept, which now exists outside Wikipedia, and is paradoxical but not solipsistic. I think that the person suggesting the idea of letting the idea grow is well-reasoned, and a time for review (say, 90 days) could be set for re-evaluation.–24.14.54.88 (talk) 22:17, 14 February 2009 (UTC)–TS
  • Comment: Please note that, transgressive though they were, the Surrealists played “exquisite corpses” using their own notepaper. They did not try to scrawl it the margins of a library book. This is the problem. Nobody objects to a Wiki based artwork. The problem is that it can’t be inserted into Wikipedia because Wikipedia is not just a Wiki. It is an encyclopedia. It is no more appropriate to add non-encyclopaedic content here than it is to write stuff in library books. I have refrained from using the term “vandalism” because I think this is all a big misunderstanding rather than a deliberate attempt to damage Wikipedia. None the less, that is the effect it is having. —DanielRigal (talk) 22:24, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment: I would very much beg to differ on the point of the Surrealists. Dali would lay in traffic, Artaud organized a riot aginst Dulac’s first screening of the Clergyman and the Seashell. If the Surrealists would have found it “appropriate” for the message, I am absolutely sure they would have done Corpses in the library. The way I see it, if it gets pulled, it will become by definition a case for reinsertion as an “event” in New Media art history. However, I know the project is being watched by a number of curators with great interest.–Patlichty (talk) 23:36, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

LINK

Posted in art, art and tech, creative commons, inbox, Ireland Art, Links, me, milwaukee art, news and politics, pop culture, re-blog tidbits, reviews, south african art, stimulus, theory, uncategorical ·

Archives

14 February 2009 by nathaniel

Wikipedia Art

Wikipedia Art logoWikipedia Art launch – TODAY! SEE THE INTERVIEW

A collaborative project initiated by Nathaniel Stern and Scott Kildall, Wikipedia Art is art composed on Wikipedia, and thus art that anyone can edit. Since the work itself manifests as a conventional Wikipedia page, would-be art editors are required to follow Wikipedia’s enforced standards of quality and verifiability; any changes to the art must be published on, and cited from, ‘credible’ external sources: interviews, blogs, or articles in ‘trustworthy’ media institutions, which birth and then slowly transform what the work is and does and means simply through their writing and talking about it. Wikipedia Art may start as an intervention, turn into an object, die and be resurrected, etc, through a creative pattern / feedback loop of publish-cite-transform that we call “performative citations.” Wikipedia Art MUST BE written about extensively both on- and off-line. This serves the dual purpose of verifying the work – which is considered controversial by those in the Wikipedia community, and occasionally removed from the site – as well as transforming it over time. WE INVITE YOU TO DO SO!

WikipediaArt.org
the Wikipedia Art page on Wikipedia
the MyArtSpace Blog interview that birthed Wikipedia Art

Posted in art, art and tech, creative commons, Links, me, milwaukee art, pop culture, research, south african art, stimulus, technology, theory, uncategorical ·

Archives

24 January 2009 by nathaniel

beginning of term

I’m mostly finishing up what will be the next to last draft of my PhD dissertation, prepping for my new classes (awesome!), and working on several art projects that will be launched in the first half of this year – video, print, net, conceptual, interactive, and many combinations in between. But I also spend a LOT of time circumventing my inbox. You know what I mean. Here’s a great li’l quote from Merlin Mann, via Clay Shirky, which was printed on Andrew Sullivan’s blog by Patrick Appel (my brain hurts just typing that interconnection):

Email is such a funny thing. People hand you these single little messages that are no heavier than a river pebble. But it doesn’t take long until you have acquired a pile of pebbles that’s taller than you and heavier than you could ever hope to move, even if you wanted to do it over a few dozen trips. But for the person who took the time to hand you the pebble it seems outrageous that you can’t handle the one tiny thing. “What ‘pile’? It’s just a pebble!”

And of course, the only reason they handed you the pebble in the first place, is cuz they like the work you had been doing until you had to spend all your time answering email.

Posted in inbox, me, pop culture, re-blog tidbits ·

Archives

19 January 2009 by nathaniel

UW-Milwaukee Grad Student feature: Brandon Bauer

This is the first in a series of MFA student features from the graduate program I work in at Peck School of the Arts,  the University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee. These will be cross-posted on the MyArtSpace.com blog.

Creative Commons License
UW-Milwaukee Grad Student features are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License

Brandon Bauer is a multi-disciplinary artist living and working in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. His work explores how the strategy of collage creates or obscures meaning. Brandon’s art has been exhibited in the Aces(s) electronic media festival in Pau, France, The European Media Arts Festival in Osnabruck, Germany, and at Project 101 in Paris among several other national and international venues. His work has been produced in DVD editions, used as illustration for various editorial publications and books, and has been published in poster editions. Brandon has recently completed his MA at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and is currently pursuing his MFA with a focus on intermedia. Brandon is an adjunct Time Based Media faculty member at the Milwaukee Institute of Art and Design.

Talk about your current practice. What do you make and why is that important to you?

In many ways I consider myself a collage artist, although I have an expanded definition of what collage is or can be. The products of the mediated world are my material starting point. It has only been in the last few years that I have fully embraced the concept of collage as my medium, and recognized the need for me to confront mediated images directly. I became aware in the last few years that I had always been responding to mediated forms in my work, and with that recognition, I found that I needed to work with these forms in a direct way. My recent exhibition Words Are Not Enough at the Inova/Arts Center Gallery in Milwaukee was a critical examination of the products of the media sphere as well as different ways in which to work with them, analyze them, break them down, recombine them, unform them, and manipulate them. The exhibition was an investigation of ideology and the construction of discourse in the media as well as a critique of these operations.

Images and details from the Words Are Not Enough exhibition, Inova/Arts Center Gallery at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Fall 2008

What got you to this point? What were you doing or making before, and how did that lead you to this kind of production?

I realized I had always been responding to the media in one way or another, and collage has been a constant component in my work, so in the last few years I decided to really concentrate on these forms, strategies, and methods. I think I first realized I was responding directly to media and mediated images in the 1990’s when the images surfaced of the emaciated prisoners in the camps during the war in the Balkans. After seeing those images I began working on a series that came to be called Hungry Ghosts; the series encompassed paintings, drawings, and mixed media works that all depicted tall, withered, cadaverous figures. The collage element came into the works as newspaper pages and headlines buried in the paint so that they could only be seen or revealed by looking closely at the work.

I Bury the Dead in My Belly, from the series Hungry Ghosts, mixed media on wood, 60 x 40.5 inches, 2001

The biggest change in my work came as a result of 9/11 and the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Those events really made me reassess the role of art and the need to find a more responsive critical practice. Working on an oil painting for a month in the seclusion of the studio was not going to allow me the kind of direct critical response that I felt was necessary in face of the rush to war that occurred. It was actually quite an empowering moment to be an artist, I wasn’t the only one to feel that way, and that is what made it so empowering- there was an amazing surge of artistic activity as artists all over the world attempted to put their talents in the service of a critical response to the rush to war by the Bush administration. I was very fortunate to co-edit a book called Peace Signs: The Anti-War Movement Illustrated, that chronicled the worldwide graphic response to the march to war by the United States. The Spanish language version of the book won the Ciutat prize for design in Barcelona for the year 2003. This was the first time that this massive surge of creativity was mounted to try to stop a war before it had even started. Most anti-war art historically has been made during ongoing conflicts, or when specific atrocities came to light, or in the case of graphic works like Goya’s Disasters of War, or Otto Dix’s Der Krieg, made years after the fact. Anyway, it was during this time that I tried to find a more responsive critical practice, and looked for different ways of getting the work out there into the world. I did a number of flyers and stickers to be placed directly on the street, and started doing illustrations for publications like Clamor Magazine and Earth First!, as well as working with other activist based art groups like Visual Resistance and Just Seeds. All of this made me think more critically about the function of art, and eventually led me to work with media as a material in a more specifically critical way.

Peace Signs: The Anti-War Movement Illustrated cover

More Dead and Wounded Everyday sticker and placement, created to mark the 1,000 U.S. casualty in the Iraq war, 2004

Corpobot, Illustration for Clamor Magazine May/June 2004

Who inspires you – that you know personally, as well as historically or in contemporary practice?

I am constantly inspired by my friends and so many of the people around me and what they do. Colin Matthes is a good example. He is insanely productive and an immense talent; his last exhibition, War Fair: Occupation Games for Citizens and Non-Combatants, was astounding – a combination of interactive carnival games as a critique of contemporary warfare. Colin and I collaborated on an exhibition in 2007 called Over There, which brought together work we had both been producing independently as well as collaborative art we made specifically for that show. I think that collaboration opened up avenues and possibilities for both of us that we have continued to expand upon in our own ways. I love collaborative projects in general; that kind of work always motivates me and inspires me.

Brandon Bauer and Colin Matthes installing work for the Over There exhibition, Brooks Barrow Gallery, Milwaukee WI, September 2007

As for historic inspirations, I always come back to the collage and photomontage work of the Dada artists as well as the Neo-Dadaist assemblage work like Rauschenberg’s “combines” and the work of Bruce Connor. I consistently find new ways to appreciate the work from these two periods on many different levels. As for contemporary artists, I am very interested in the work of Thomas Hirschhorn, especially his public monuments, and the work of Cady Noland really intrigues me. I respond to the fearlessness of Hirschhorn’s work, and the fact that he takes the general public seriously as readers of philosophy. I love the innate democratic quality of his public art, and the fact that he is unafraid to confront theory with praxis. I am intrigued by Noland’s work with appropriated materials and her investigation of the undercurrent of violence in the American character. She is an artist whose work I want to spend more time with. My list of inspirations could really go on forever. I try to absorb everything I can, am an omnivorous reader and always hungry visually. Lately I have been reading a lot of Jacques Rancière – his analysis of montage informed a lot of the work in my last exhibition, and I have recently picked up some of his non art-related critical writing on democracy, to see where it might lead me.

Tell us about your favorite and least favorite works of art from your entire repertoire – why they deserve those titles and what you learned from them.

Least favorite… that is honestly a very difficult question for me because I get something out of everything I make, successful or not. I tend to rework things endlessly so a piece I am not happy about may get cut up and recombined into a new work, or may be worked over until it feels right. It’s like Colin said as we were collaborating on work for the Over There exhibition, and I’m paraphrasing him: “either it’s going to be great or I’m going to run it into the ground- there is no in-between”… That’s basically it, I’m either going to make it work or create an absolute disaster. Usually my unsuccessful pieces get re-purposed or reworked into new pieces. Art is a fluid process for me, and in that way there are no real failures… I almost wish I would make a spectacular disaster- it may be my greatest work!

As for my favorite, that’s hard too… I guess I would have to say I really love the work I was doing in 2006, because that work was a point in which all of my concerns started coming together. I am particularly fond of much of the collage work I did then, as well as the video work in the short/cuts series, which was a series of 30 short videos experimenting with a variety of different aspects of the video medium. There was just an openness and honesty in the work I was making then, I was trying to zero in on what motivated me to make work and why, and I think it comes across in those pieces. My current work owes a great debt to that period of focused experimentation.

Grassroots Congress, mixed media and collage on paper 4 x 6 inches, 2006

IR, mixed media and collage on paper 4 x 6 inches, 2006

And, mixed media and collage on paper 4 x 6 inches, 2006

What are you working on right now, and where do you see your work headed next?

Right now I am in the midst of the preparatory work for a rotoscope animation project, and there are a number of threads I touched on in my exhibition Words Are Not Enough that I want to continue, expand upon and develop further. I also work with a number of other people on various projects and we have some irons in the fire. I recently contributed to a portfolio project through Just Seeds about the prison industrial complex that will tour through Canada and has some other exhibition dates slated in the US. I will have a DVD released soon of video collaborations I did with the Milwaukee based experimental noise musician Peter J. Woods, and I am involved with ongoing projects for the BATHAS Internationale, which is an anonymous participatory umbrella collective project that explores how the modernist avant-garde notion of negation as revolt has been taken up by subcultures in contemporary society. I am in discussions with A. Bill Miller of Master-List 2000 about a BATHAS/Master-List 2000 net-art collaboration, but that is still in the initial stages. I will have a review of Jacques Rancière’s The Future of the Image published in the next edition of the FATE journal discussing its use in foundations level pedagogy. Beyond that my wife and I just had our first baby, so maybe I need to find an art practice that just involves me holding my little baby girl…

Posted in art, art and tech, me, milwaukee art, pop culture, re-blog tidbits, research, reviews, stimulus, technology ·

Archives

25 December 2008 by nathaniel

Tops of 2008: A Different Kind of Year in Review

Merry Christmakkah! Happy new year!

The turkey is defrosting (mmmm, bourbon basting), Sidonie stayed up late (for a two year old) last night eating chocolate and playing with her new doll house from her ouma (OMG I have the cutest daughter ever), and I have little bit of morning to pound out a blog on what will probably be the only full day off I take this year (OK, OK, I already spent 30 mins on my dissertation when I first woke up, but the thing has to get done, right? Wait, is blogging ‘work’?).

So for my Tops of 2008: A Different Kind of Year in Review, I’ve decided to go with four different Top 5 lists: The Top 5 people I newly met in 2008, The Top 5 people I’d like to meet because of what they did (or the work I saw from them) in 2008, The Top 5 exhibitions for me (what I found most enjoyable), and The Top 5 shows I wish I had seen, but didn’t. Hope you like it! Feel free to comment, leaving any things/people I missed but might (or should have) enjoy(ed)!

The Top 5 people I newly met in 2008

  1. Scott Kildall. A great net.artist, video artist, SL performer, and more – and becoming a great friend – check out his work if you don’t know it, and expect some collaborations from the two of us in the near future. Scott and I were introduced online through a mutual friend over a year ago, and did several shows together because of that contact, but only met in person for the first time this year.
    Scott Kildalls Uncertain Location, 2007

    Scott Kildall's 'Uncertain Location,' 2007

  2. Camille Utterback. Also an amazing (and award-winning) artist, working mostly in interactive media, Camille makes appearances in my recent writings on Rhizome and in my dissertation. She came out for the Act/React exhibition in Milwaukee, on which she has 3 works; we did dinner and grad crits, and plan to hang out again in San Fransisco before too long.
  3. Edward Winkleman (that’s his blog link, here is his gallery). I popped in to curator and gallerist Ed Winkleman’s space for a chat on my stop-over in New York when moving from Ireland/South Africa to Milwaukee for the new job. He is as professional, excitable and generous with his time, critique and advice as his blog suggests.
  4. Zach Lieberman (his site seems to currently be down, so that link googles him). Co-creator (with the also awesome Theo Watson) of openframeworks, the free, open source, multimedia art development environment, Zach is an Ars Electronica-winning artist, Eyebeam fellow and NYC-based teacher. I took an openframeworks workshop with him in London, where he “adopted” everyone there: a promise to help us with our work how- and whenever he could in the future.
  5. Jessica Meuninck-Ganger, my new printmaking collaborator who I speak of at length here. Expect much from us in 2009.

Top 5 people I’d like to meet because of what they did (or the work I saw from them) in 2008

  1. Rachel Maddow. Maddow is the only news pundit I’ve ever had a crush on. (Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert don’t count). I’ve been following her for over 3 years now – I used to listen to her show on Air America via the internet in South Africa – and she gets even cooler as she gets more famous.
  2. Brian Massumi. Yes, I’ve been going on about cultural theorist and philosopher Massumi for ages; but I still have not met him, I am more familiar with his work the more I write about it, and he does have a new essay out in this book. I still find his Parables for the Virtual dreamy.
  3. Johan Grimonprez. A brilliant video -actually, it may be film- and print artist. Grimonprez is obviously obsessed with Hitchcock and all he has done to culture and vision, and gifts it back to us in the most stunning and unusual ways. You must see his 2005, Looking for Alfred. I wish he had more of an online presence!
  4. Ai Weiwei. I saw Chinese art celebrity Ai Weiwei’s interdisciplinary art work at dokumenta 12 – and I can’t remember where else – in 2007, and have been reading up on him ever since (and so am counting him in 2008). His site does him no justice, so google him. Amazing.

    Ai Weiwei's 'Template'

    Ai Weiwei's 'Template'

  5. Shai Agassi. Have you read this guy’s ideas for the electric car? Check out this Wired Article on him and his work/mission.

The Top 5 exhibitions for me (what I found most enjoyable)

  1. Act/React at the Milwaukee Art Museum. This exhibition of full-bodied interactive art was like a welcome present – it opened just weeks after my arrival to my new home. It’s a great show – you really should go see it if you are in the Midwest before it comes down early next year. Read my review here.
  2. Juan Muñoz: A Retrospective at the Tate Modern. Granted, part of my enjoyment of this show was the company and conversation (every time I go to London, the wonderfully gregarious Michael Szpakowski takes me museum/gallery hopping), but Muñoz’s work also encompasses some of the most affective and gut-wrenching sculpture I’ve ever seen.

    Juan Muñoz, Many Times, 1999. Polyester and resin, Dimensions variable

    Juan Muñoz, Many Times, 1999. Polyester and resin, Dimensions variable

  3. Song of Solomon at the Project Arts Centre, Dublin, Ireland. This was actually a performance-based adaptation of an 8-channel generative sound sculpture by Ralph Borland (fellow South African artist and Trinity grad student) and Julian Jonker, but I found the performance version wonderfully moving. See slightly more about the piece, and what I thought, here.
  4. When enough people start saying the same thing, Michael MacGarry at Art Extra, Johannesburg, South Africa. This show was a double wammy: it proved MacGarry’s standing as the new hot young art star in South Africa, and simultaneously solidified David Brodie’s standing as the hot new gallerist. The latter already has an ongoing and reciprocal deal with Cape Town’s Michael Stevenson Gallery. Also, the show was great. More here and here.
  5. Duchamp, Man Ray, Picabia: The Moment Art Changed Forever at the Tate Modern. So it’s a historical show and the second one I’ve put from the Tate, but what a show! And Michael really is fantastic to talk to about art – it makes the whole experience much more exciting. Also, check out his beautiful vlog.

The Top 5 shows I wish I had seen, but didn’t

  1. (REPEAT) from the beginning, William Kentridge’s new solo at the Cape Goodman in Cape Town, South Africa (and elsewhere). Need I say more? This is on now.

    Construction for 'Return' (Conductor), 2008, Steel, black paint, Two identical figures, each c. 61 x 61 x 33cm

    Construction for 'Return' (Conductor), 2008, Steel, black paint, Two identical figures, each c. 61 x 61 x 33cm

  2. The Art of Participation, 1950 to Now at SF MOMA. This show makes both implicit and explicit connections between relational aesthetics and interactive / net.art, through historical and contemporary work. And several of my friends are on it!
  3. Take Your Time, Olafur Eliasson at MoMA and P.S.1. Eliasson has gotten to the point where he is big enough that it is trendy to hate him – and yeh, as Paddy Johnson asserts, his waterfall in NYC sucks. But from what I have seen of his work, I am sure this retrospective was stunning.
  4. .ZA Young Art From South Africa at Palazzo delle Papesse, Sienna. Many of the new, young contemporary art stars from South Africa are on this exhibition. They all deserve props, and I wish I could have been there to give ’em some. Here’s a review by Rat Western.
  5. Jozi and the (M)other City at Michaelis Gallery, Cape Town, South Africa. A group show of commissioned works by South African artists on their relationships to the cities of Johannesburg and Cape Town, and also the commissioner/premier  for my Doin’ my part to lighten the load. Some of the work looks awesome, so I was really sad to miss it. Sigh. I miss you, South Africa (especially from under all this snow in Milwaukee!).

Dude, I forgot how long proper blogging takes. That’s all I got. Happy Holidays!!!!

Posted in art, art and tech, Ireland Art, me, milwaukee art, news and politics, pop culture, re-blog tidbits, research, reviews, south african art, stimulus ·
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

Tags

aesthetics alice wilds art artist feature avant-garde books briefiew coding comics concern culture digital studio drawing ecology engineering fantasy fiction goods for me google ilona andrews jon horvath kate daniels milwaukee mo gawdat nathaniel stern paduak philosophy public property reading review sean slemon self-enjoyment Steve Martin syllabus sharing teaching technology TED TEDx trees urban fantasy web-comics webcomics whitehead world after us writing

nathaniel’s books

Interactive Art and Embodiment book cover
Interactive Art and Embodiment: the implicit body as performance

from Amazon.com

Buy Interactive Art for $30 directly from the publisher

Ecological Aesthetics book cover
Ecological Aesthetics: artful tactics for humans, nature, and politics

from Amazon.com

All content © 2026 by implicit art. Base WordPress Theme by Graph Paper Press