implicit art

art and ecology, fiction and geek stuff, culture and philosophy, parenting and life, etc

implicit art

re-blog tidbits

Archives

06 November 2005 by BradyDale

Reviews of Lots of Little Comics

REVIEWS! REVIEWS! REVIEWS!
So, I’ve been so busy that I’ve hardly had any time to read all the comics and mini comics I bought at the Small Press Expo in Bethesda, Maryland at the end of last September.

But I am finally getting started. I thought I would review all the comics I read on here, but I think I will just review the ones I like.

“Lightbulb” < - no actual title
by Linda Medley
mini-comic from One Percent Press

This comic is visually charming. It’s an experimental representation of a young artist wrestling with an idea until he is ready to work with it. The pages are dark (literally, not metaphorically), until the artist finally settles on what he wants to do with his idea, then he gets to it. Charming.

“Driving South”
by JP Coovert
One Percent Press

I really enjoyed this comic. It’s very cartoony drawings of normal looking people (stripped down to the simplest lines). It’s the story of a boy who goes home for his grandfather’s funeral. I don’t want to say what happens at the end, but let’s say this: he’s very busy through the whole funeral process.

We buried my grandfather not so long ago, and I saw a lot of truth in this story. It’s elegantly done and the drawing is really solid throughout. It once again demonstrates for me that the best artists leave out more than they put in. Not always true, but there’s a lot to say for economy.

“Onion Jack”
by Joel Priddy
from Ad House Books

This was really just the cover story for Ad House Books’s Free Comic Book Day offering, Issue Zero!!! Superior Showcase. I don’t want to beat a dead horse, here, but for all of Coovert’s economy above, he’s a morass of crosshatching compared to Priddy’s beautiful bio of the inestimable superhero, Onion Head Jack. Priddy reduces heroes and villains down to their most iconic with remarkable effectiveness. Many fools will look at these drawings and say, “anyone could draw that.”

Yeah?

Try it, then. Try to draw a readable story with drawings as simple as this. Hell, try to even come up with one character that looks at all unique using the same economy he uses.

You’ll be surprised. I know some other artists out there that can do it, but simplicity is deceptive. I’ve always said that in almost all things it is much harder to be easy to understand than it is to be mysterious.

Plus, the Onion Head Jack story is a great one – if you love heroes – and ends fantastically, surprisingly and satisfyingly. Find it. Love it. I have to check out more of this guy’s work.

“Monday” part 1
mini-comic by Andy Hartzel

This is the story of Adam and Eve after the first week of creation have ended. Many liberties are taken with the story. Hartzell has a lot of talent and his drawings are pretty. His representation of God is adorable and his Eve has a very cute butt. I hope I see Part 2 at some point.

“Keeping Two” part 1
by Jordan Crane

Jordan Crane is the youngest old-hand out there. I picked this up because Jordan Crane is famous, the cover price was low and the screen printed cover was very pretty. Also because he was standing next to Brian Ralph. This helped Jordan’s sales a lot, I’m sure, as Ralph is the closest thing the comics world has to a pop star (sorry, James K., but I thought of you when I wrote that… you are still a SUPERSTAR!).

At first I thought this story would bore the shit out of me. It’s very much a slice of life story, but it turns out to include high drama. A woman encourages her husband to go on a trip. Because he goes, he misses the birth of their child.

It gets worse. You feel for them.

Crane’s story is told with enough little details to make it feel true and you develop a definite sympathy for the stars of this show in only a few pages.

Another thing I appreciate about Crane is his willingness to show you around the world his characters find themselves in, to take some time with the story and give you the wide view. This is rare in American comics, but Crane does it. It makes the book feel different, in a great way.

Again, I hope I find the second part when it comes out.

“The Intruder”
by Mark Burrier

The art in this story bridges the gap between all the work above and the last one I will write about today, below. The lines in this book are clean, but not quite so clean. He has a lot more edge in his drawings. A lot more motion lines and more more shading. Some very splattery shadowing at parts.

This is all done for a purpose and intentionally. Burrier keeps his lines under control, unless he doesn’t want to. And that’s good. This is a story about completely unnecessary anger and completely unnecessary machismo. It’s about the way men with their women can just be dicks sometimes.

It’s a simple story, about a young boy who finds people making out in the back of his office who don’t work there, aren’t customers and who he’s never seen before. All he asks is that they leave and they won’t. It’s bizarre, but you can see it happening. Some men really would pull that shit with their blood up in the wrong spot/part.

The only crticism I would make of this book is that Burrier probably turns to the panel’less page a little more often than I’d like. Stripping panel borders away from pages can be the right thing to do, but I like it to happen in a way that makes so much sense that I don’t even really notice it. I was very, very conscious of the pages that didn’t have panel borders, and didn’t really see what point there was in leaving them off.

Still, art is about emotion and this one was emotionally evocative in a wonderfully effective way. More importantly, I think Burrier evokes a combination of emotions – uncertain power, anger and righteousness – that we don’t often see in comics. It’s always nice to see an artist try to break into new emotional ground with their work, and I think the field of comics is richer for it. Comic artists tend to rely on a certain limited pallette of emotions too often. Maybe someday when I have more philosophical time I will try to delineate what those are. Anyway, Burrier definitely isn’t in the comic book cliche category with this one, and bravo for it.

“Sea-Man Lamprey”
mini-comic by Mollie Goldstrom

All the rest of the comics I have reviewed so far had nice, clean lines with a strong consciousness of the figure and how it interacts with other figures and objects. Very little shading and unneccessary line work appear in the pages of the comics previously listed (maybe “Monday” is a little busy).

Throw everything I said about how great economy is OUT when you get ready to read Goldstrom’s 4″ x 4″ offering. This one is a mess. A very rich mess. A delicious mess. I like that I have this review in the mix because it shows there is more than one way to do things in the land of art and comics. In fact, Mollie’s work is a lot of fun even though she completely stands in contrast to all the compliments I gave the other artists above.

From the very first page (you really just have to see it), Goldstrom achieves something in drawing what I think must be the most nonsensical sea monster in the history of visual depictions of sea monsters. I mean, if the creature had a larger place in the story, you could entitle the work “Intestines from the Deep.” Go, Mollie!

This is the story of Erasmus Lamprey, mythical seafarer, wanderer. Erasmus has strange friends, strange abilities and strange adventures (all in about 16 pages). Goldstrom’s book definitely falls into the camp of Jennifer Daydreamer in that she tells stories that have the logic of dreams. That is, very little logic at all – but you understand anyway.

Erasmus, as a character, is pretty flat. That doesn’t matter. You’re here to see the world of Goldstrom’s imagination, and you do it by following Erasmus around. The point is Goldstrom’s drawings and trying to figure out how her mind works.

Goldstrom is part of a vein of comics that I think make the comics world one of the richest art scenes you’ll find (if you aren’t a closed minded fuck who dismisses comics out of hand). She has a lot of limitations, technically, as a draughtsman. You can see in reading these pages that she has tested the limits of her limitations and learned to work around them, even with them, creating environments and images that are within her power, technically, and, artistically, up there with any artist of her age and experience out there (and quite a few who’ve been at it longer and ought to be able to accomplish more by now).

I know this sounds like backhanded praise, but I don’t want it to. This is a hard point for me to get across, but let me try to restate it: most art forms put too much stock in technical ability. If art is, in the end, about self-expression, then there might be some people who learn to express themselves extremely well despite the fact that their fundamentals are weak.

Think, for example, of the illiterate storyteller. There have doubtless been countless storytellers and bards over the centuries who couln’t read, spoke only in vernacular and had embarassing grammar. Yet, if they got on a stump and started telling stories you’d be hypnotized. This is the perfect example of the less technically proficient artist performing brilliantly.

I mean, people dismiss punk rock, but it changed music forever and for the better. When punk started, half those guys couldn’t even really play their instruments – yet they changed music forever. I can’t overemphasize this enough. Technical ability is not all that, and I’ve certainly seen some people who draw really well – and everything they draw bores the living hell out of me. Seriously. I’m like: spare me, mofo.

Goldstrom will never be able to, I don’t think, draw a world with both the exquisite realism and cartoony simplicity of, say, a Jason Lutes. It doesn’t matter. Read “Sea Man Lamprey” and you’ll feel like you know something about Goldstrom’s mind, and you’ll want to meet her. Much as a lot of people feel about Lutes’s work.

So there, that’s my point. The comics scene makes more space and opens its arms more widely to the artistically gifted but technically limited among us. I definitely fall into this category, and I appreciate the fact that I feel comfortable making and sending out comics, because I know people into this medium understand that looks aren’t everything.

Lots more comics in my satchel o’ fun. I’ll let you know the next time I read through a stack. In the meantime, be a dear and visit some of these websites and buy some of these comics. Make a young artist’s day!

“Future Me”
by Jesse Moynihan
Mini-comic – $3.00

This mini-comic is beautiful. Fellow Philadelphian, Jesse Moynihan, really has a handle on the whole simple yet beautiful line style thing. You aren’t going to look at thise pages and say, “Wow! What detail!” This is actual art, so you’ll just say “wow.” With no exclamation point. Partly because you aren’t quite sure what’s so captivating.

But it is, baby. It is. One of my favorite elements is his use of patterned materials to fill up spaces. The pages look more intimate than if he had left off that detail, but since it’s a pattern it sort of disappears in a way, like white space does. Making it a sort of alternative-negative-space, that I like to see a good amount of on a page. At least for this sort of meditative story. Meditative it is.

On the other hand, it doesn’t entirely make sense. You’ve got to have the same patience with this book that you bring to a museum when you look at paintings that are really impressive but you don’t quite understand. In fact, Jesse’s work is easier to understand than a lot of really great paintings I’ve seen, but it’s also narrative so you sort of expect to understand everything or nearly-everything. That’s not going to be the case with “Future Me.”

That said, I’ve communicated with Jesse about this and he says that the more of his work you read the more it all makes sense. So that’s promising. “Future Me” definitely made me want to see more.

“_______ Are Always Fun to Draw”
by a lot of people (mostly in New York, I think)

This book is not really a comic. It’s a collection of drawings that a bunch of friends made after compiling a list of a billion things that are “always fun to draw.” They had a master list of like 30 things that EVERYONE had to draw and another much longer list that everyone had to pick ten more things from. The only rule, I think, was to get all of the things onto one page.

So everyone did it and then they printed it up. The result is a great little book with great pictures in wildly diverse drawing styles. Some of them are really inspired.

The list of fun stuff to draw includes earthworms, explosions, ducks, cats, fish, space aliens, etc. It’s pretty wide open. My favorite was, arguably, Isaac Cates’s alphabet (incidentally, he organized the project). A lot of them are really good, though. Karen Sneider uses an interesting device in her page. If she doesn’t think the thing she has to draw is fun, it’s being killed or destroyed in her drawing. She pointed this out to me herself at SPX when I was looking at the book. I was amazed to see that she doesn’t like to draw robots.

Who doesn’t like to draw robots?

I wish I could tell you how to get your hands on it, but I can’t. You might try contacting Karen Sneider directly, because her bio says she’s working on a sequel. Which implies she might know something about the original.

Midnight Creep
by Frederick Noland
Mini-comic, Post-Apocalyptic Funhouse

I think this might be a comic version of a southern fable. Anyway, it’s the story of a poor black working man in the South who’s telling a stranger in a boxcar about murders he committed as a result of his wife’s infidelity. He’s been on the run ever since.

He gets his come-uppance. Boy howdy.

The design and draughtsmanship falls somewhere in between realistic and cartoony – and nicely so. The pages are laid out well and the overall design shows a real eye for the importance of a well planned page.

The sequence that reveals the true identity of the narrator’s companion in the boxcar can be described as controlled, steady cinema.

Check this shit out, brother.

RHYTHM
Anthology by Turk Street Projects

This is a nice anthology that I have no memory of buying, who I got it from or how you can get your hands on it. I can say this: it introduced me to Joe Sayers who has a t-shirt (the gold one) on his website that I am definitely going to have to buy.

This anthology is different stories about rhythm. The stand out is probably the story about murdering Jimi Hendrix is probably the stand out, by Geoff Vasile. The one pagers at the beginning and the end are pretty great, too.

Out of Water
by Matthew Bernier
tinglyelectriceelunderpants@hotmail.com

This is probably the best drawn book, over all, in today’s collection of reviews. Very, very Craig Thompson’ish. In fact, he’s probably technically a little more powerful than Thompson, though we’ll see if he has the emotional range of Thompson. This work is too short to really weight it against Goodbye, Chunky Rice.

He seems to be a little fixated on gonads, I gotta say. And anatomy. Not external anatomy. For some reason he periodially shows cut-aways of his characters so that you can see their guts.

It’s funny, just yesterday I was thinking about how much I love my skeleton and yet I hope never, ever to lay my eyes on even one fraction of one inch of any of my bones. Ever. Funny, that.

Not so sure I want to see the guts of my comic book characters either. It reminds me of the Paul Pope comic where no one is interested in seeing strippers naked anymore… they have machines that allow you to see their guts bobbing around as they dance.

I cannot imagine this ever actually being a turn-on, but I could be wrong.

“Out of Water” is a sweet story about an awkward boy that develops a great friendship with a dolphin. This is, of course, in some ways a dangerous friend to have. Dolphins do not play in an environment that’s wholly convenable to boys, but the environment of boys is not at all hospitable to dolphins. This point is one that Bernier does an excellent job, in ways both overt, subtle and so subtle that you will realize it later, of conveying.

The story, in the end, is about solving the problem of environments. You should definitely email him and order a copy. One of these days I’ll get around to ordering some of his other work.
I also have one other much longer review of a longer book, “Top Secret Summer,” here

Posted in art, brady dale, pop culture, re-blog tidbits, uncategorical ·

Archives

06 November 2005 by nathaniel

podcast odys!

odys for your ipod is now available as individual zipped files, a whole package, and even a podcast! Fun to play, and should work in all new iTunes: window and mac. Am still trying to get links direct to iTunes store, but being an indy artist one-off, no promises. For those who don’t know it, the artwork goes like this:

odys for your iPod (2005) is an extension of the odys series (2001-2004). the odys series consists of six short digital video poems / monologues for small screen viewing in an intimate gallery space. By stuttering between odys’ actions and words, listeners construct his person. As he attempts to re-member, bringing the past back to his body and calling it his own, listeners attempt to piece together a story for themselves. Viewers are encouraged to re-visit and jump over juxtaposed media, and create a shifting collage of, and in response to, his person.

odys for your iPod encourages viewers to download all six of the newly optimized video art pieces from odys.org, and into iTunes and their iPods. It allows for an even more intimate and physical relationship with his character, as well as a continually growing connection with each vignette.

odys’ name comes from The Odyssey; he is the traveler, the seeker of home (Ithaca). Contrary to both Odysseus and hektor ( see http://hektor.net ), odys is an unconvincing liar and horrible storyteller. His failed attempts to speak the traumatic past are often mistaken for nonsense. Ironically, odys’ poor endeavors at communication can now be largely consumed by a take-away transmission: online at odys.org.

odys’ language of utterances is about the "spaces between." The space between words, between articulation and inarticulation, between Troy and Ithaca, between judgment and responsibility, and between speaker and listener.

Enjoy!

Posted in art, art and tech, me, music, pop culture, re-blog tidbits, south african art, technology ·

Archives

03 November 2005 by nathaniel

while in New York…

…do as the New Yorkers do.

Ironic that the city most affected by September 11th voted less than 15% for George W. Bush. For those of you don’t know (as I have a lot of readership in South Africa and Amsterdam), Democrats closed congress yesterday, seeing an opportunity (after the Libby indictment) to finally hold some people in this administration accountable for various, shall we call them, ‘inconsistencies’…. Here’s some more:

What Judy forgot: Your right to know – Los Angeles Times — if the indictment and research could have happened when it was supposed to, over a year ago (and was not obstructed by members of the White House and Republican party), George W Bush would not be president today.

Rove’s Future Role Is Debated — that in mind, what is up with this Rove character.?

CBS News | Poll: Approval Ratings Compared | November 2, 2005 22:00:08 — the polls say that Bush is way less popular than anyone ‘cept Nixon, and that way more people want him impeached than did want Clinton (who, tho people tend to forget, was impeached; I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: I prefer a president who gets BJs and lies, to one who goes to war based on lies….).

Here’s a closer look at the most important numbers from the above poll. When on earth will the mainstream media catch up? I understand that Fox news is fair and balanced and so I cannot expect them to say anything that would ever harm their candidate, but where is everyone else?

Carter on a morning show. President Carter once had an administration who lied – he asked his entire cabinet to resign. I guess Bush has trouble firing people loyal to him. Cover up + loyal to president = not so honest president?

I’m not sure why it is that, just because of the divisiveness of this nation, Dems and Reps think their candidate is always right; we have to follow blindly. No matter what world you live in, these guys committed treason, lied, went to war on lies, covered it up, and, as is becoming more clear to the general public, have the majority of the media in their pocket. My friend Jane says that I simply buy into too much liberal media, like CNN and the NY times — I just laughed and asked where this liberal media was, cuz I’d like to see it. Compared to her news station (Fox), George Bush is liberal media, so I guess I could see where she is confused about the other two.

I think I’m going to run for president in 2008. Even if it don’t work, might be a neat art project. The first thing I’d like to do is go to war with Fox. They are a much bigger threat to the American way of life than Iraq was.

Posted in news and politics, pop culture, re-blog tidbits, stimulus ·

Archives

01 November 2005 by nathaniel

churchy

Is it just me, or are you guys also getting church ads and Christ links in the google adsense stuff at right (in my sidebar)? It probably has to do with Kaganof’s the son of man post, but it’s freakin me out. Clicky clicky.

Posted in pop culture, re-blog tidbits, stimulus, uncategorical ·

Archives

21 October 2005 by AJ

I feel cheated.

While Nathaniel is working on the new servers, I felt I would try to post something entertaining, which nevertheless wasn’t a crisis if it got lost. A re-blog was the obvious choice. So herewith, a little something I wrote a couple of weeks ago.

—-
“Apollo 11 was ten years ahead of schedule – that means as an author, I have to adjust all my timelines, we’re on the moon and it’s 1969 – that means that what I predicted for 2001 is now suddenly more likely to exist in 1981” – Arthur C. Clarke, author of 2001 – A space oddesey, October 3rd 1969.

I feel cheated.

It’s now 2006. Not only are we not anywhere near the tech that we Clarke anticipated for 1981, we didn’t even get there in 2001. Where’s my jetcar ? I want my lasergun damnit ! Oh and those x-ray glasses… mmm…
But I digress. What went wrong ? A hundred and fifty years ago the first scifi author (unless you count Dante) Jules Verne wrote a manuscript called “Paris 1939”. He predicts a city where people drive cars (this appears to be the first usage of the phrase ‘horseless carriage’) and filled with electric lights everywhere – including streetlamps. Since the lightbulb wasn’t even invented yet. His publisher refused to print the book calling it “just too farfetched”. His daughter inherrited the manuscript who passed it on to her daughter, who published it to “rectify the acuracy of grand-dads storytelling vission”
Former South African Minister of the external, Pik Botha was a writer before entering politics. In 1951 he writes a story called (translation): The value of a heart. In this story, he has Joseph Stalin undergo a heart transplant. Once more the story remained unpublished for being “too unlikely”. So Mr. Botha left scifi and spent the rest of his short writing career doing romances and (rather silly) detective stories.
Less than 10 years later, the first heart transplant happened right here in South Africa.

So SCIFI authors have predicted some things remarkably well. Yet amazingly, the best of the best just doesn’t seem to match. Most profound innovation of the end of the twentieth century – the personal computer. Nobody, not one saw that one coming. They all worried about the giant computers in the corps getting too powerfull – nobody saw the ones in our homes.
Once they were there, the next great predictions were wearable computing (watches that think), and voice recognition. So far those two have materialized, but been rather a let-down (though wearable computing is growing).
So the greatest inventions, they didn’t even expect (somehow none of the scifi writers, renegades that they are, and inspiration to renegades – ever really believed in the renegades who read them, for it was those renegades (particularly Steve Wozniak) who brought us the one thing no company on earth would have thought could be sold), and we got none of their greatest promisses.

There is no reliable cryogenics system for multicelled creatures. There is no cure for cancer yet. The flying car is still just something you see in movies. Personal space travel is just a dream, and even the X-prize won’t change that very soon. The world where space ships are as simple a piece of ownership as a car today is still as far away as ever.

What’s worse, we are still stuck on some things which scientists and scifi authors called “outdated” fourty years ago. Most notably the internal combustion engin – and fossil fuels. Things which we already have better alternatives for. The cheapest being methane conversion for any car. Methane is free – governments are only too greatfull to get rid of what to them is just a waste product, you can today, for a small outlay convert any car to run on a free fuel that causes absolutely no polution. Yet there are less than 100 of them in the world.
The reason is simple: politics. Political pressure by large oil companies (and countries) keep us dead set on a course of self-destruction when we have multiple ways out – the methane conversion is just the most easilly and immediately viable.
Of course they tell you there are safety issues – as if those didn’t exist in gasoline cars earlier – fix them ! It’s easier than an electric car that still needs to have a polluting power plant somewhere.

I feel cheated. What the hell happened to the world ? The IT industry has been through dosens, that’s dosens of major revolutions in the past fourty years. Vaccuum tubes became transistors became microchips became microcomputers became home computers. Punch card binary became assembler became top down programming became modular programming became object orientation.
And even now we are on the verge of the next major breakthrough – practical nanotech, and quite likely not too long after that, quantum computing.
So why the hell are cars still essentially the same as they were in 1893 ? Why on earth are powerplants still basically what they were in 1925 ?
Innovation has not stopped, if anything the pace has picked up – but where we needed it most, it hasn’t happened. I don’t buy it. Something else is stopping the innovations from realizing into products. Something with power and money and a vested interest in the status quo – which leaves not too many usual suspects !!
I feel cheated.
The world has been cheated.
We’ve been cheated out of our very future.
Any chance you think that we can still wake up in time to take it back ?

Posted in AJ Venter, art and tech, re-blog tidbits, uncategorical ·

Archives

13 October 2005 by nathaniel

Apple does it again

OMG, Apple’s new iTunes let’s you download animations from Pixar, your favorite TV shows from the night before, etc… The new iMac has a remote control to download and play (and a built-in iSight to play with other goodies), and the new iPod lets you transfer any and all of the above to it.

At $1.99 per 1-hour TV show, and being the only place (other than P2P’s) you can get this stuff, it’s actually a great deal — even from SA. I want to see the new season of Lost, dude, but bandwidth on the P2P is too pricey from the third world; $2 is not!

Apple

Posted in art and tech, me, music, pop culture, re-blog tidbits, technology ·
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

Tags

aesthetics alice wilds art artist feature avant-garde books briefiew coding comics concern culture digital studio drawing ecology engineering fantasy fiction goods for me google ilona andrews jon horvath kate daniels milwaukee mo gawdat nathaniel stern paduak philosophy public property reading review sean slemon self-enjoyment Steve Martin syllabus sharing teaching technology TED TEDx trees urban fantasy web-comics webcomics whitehead world after us writing

nathaniel’s books

Interactive Art and Embodiment book cover
Interactive Art and Embodiment: the implicit body as performance

from Amazon.com

Buy Interactive Art for $30 directly from the publisher

Ecological Aesthetics book cover
Ecological Aesthetics: artful tactics for humans, nature, and politics

from Amazon.com

All content © 2026 by implicit art. Base WordPress Theme by Graph Paper Press