implicit art

art and ecology, fiction and geek stuff, culture and philosophy, parenting and life, etc

implicit art

AJ Venter

Archives

17 October 2005 by AJ

FSF Awarding socially benificient uses of Free Software

For quite some time now, many users and developers of FOSS software have been encouraging it’s use by civil society, in social benefit, charity and intervention projects. One sad reality is that many of these projects do not hold the individual freedom that is the heart of the free software philosophy as the main reason to use it, opting instead to cite cost advantages and technical abilities allowing for greater scale of intervention as their major reasons.
While these reasons are good reasons, and important ones, they should not in my mind be held of higher virtue than freedom, which is the single most important reason you can have to do anything. Without freedom, all other noble values, even love must sooner or later be lost.

Thus it is inspiring to see that the free software foundation has decided to honour those projects which use free software in ways that are beneficial to a wider part of the social sphere. This is a subtle way to remind those projects just where this software came from. These projects bring benefit in a wider part of the social sphere, but they must remember that bringing freedom is a noble goal in itself and not be afraid to capitalise on it, even if we have come to live in a world that considers individual freedom a swearword – that makes it even more important for especially civil uplifted projects to hold it as a high virtue.

Read the original announcement

Posted in AJ Venter ·

Archives

14 October 2005 by AJ

What the hell is a Shroedinger’s cat???

The perfect name for a temporary boolean variable…

Actually, it refers to possibly the most misunderstood theory in the history
of quantum physics.
It all started as a thought experiment by Shroedinger (the physicist), who
suggested the following:
Say you have a cat in a box.
The box is hooked up to poison gas source.
That in turn is controlled by a switch, which is activated if the quantum
state of an atom is 1 and not 0.

Now, because of Heisenberg, if you try to SEE what the quantum state is,
you’ll change it ! Because quantum states decay, it will change over time,
but you cannot predict WHEN it will happen – and kill the cat.

So until you look in the box – is the cat dead or alive ?

Shroedinger’s intention was to prove that a Grand Unified Theory of physics
would not explain or predict the entire universe – a cat can only be either
dead or alive, but even though you’ve simplified it to a system where a
single particle quantum state determines this – you nevertheless cannot
predict the final outcome.

Then a bunch of physicists who didn’t like this, met up in Bern and held a big
conference about Shroedinger’s cat. Is it alive ? Is it dead ?
Eventually they decided: well bugger this, we must be able to predict. So they
invented a new state. Saying that until you look the cat is BOTH alive and
dead and everything in between. This is known as the Bern convention.

This has had a huge impact on quantum physics, not the least of which was to
lead to a whole lot of otherwizse sane scientists inventing the multiverse
theory – which would be almost fine if it didn’t basically imply that with
every decision you make you create a new universe – all of us !
It’s a sort of an ultimate science-making-man-god thing, where there must now
exist a universe in which I did not click send !

Shroedinger himself callled the Bern Convention “nothing less than a cop-out”

All of which brings us to the single best outcome of the whole thing.
It gave us the only use for the html blink tag which shouldn’t be punishable
by death – observe:

(Note most modern browsers no longer have a working blink tag, but in older days that would have worked if it was in html).

Posted in AJ Venter, uncategorical ·

Archives

10 October 2005 by AJ

Karen Zoid stew

Standing on a rooftop in Parktown
Looking at the Jozi skyline and the vodacom sign on Ponti Towers
Where the greenery of the north gets traded
for the grey, ugly and scentless concrete flowers.

You find yourself feeling the loneliness of the people in the streets below
Each alone. Each empty. Solitary in a crowd of other strangers
And in your head Valiant Swart is playing a sad lovesong to the evening sky
And you realize, ours alone is to answer why. Everyone still strangers.

And you shake your head at the sightless eyes
and spin on your heel and stomp back to reality, a milion things to do.
And you put on your headphones and drown your sentimentality
in Karen Zoid stew.

Posted in AJ Venter, uncategorical ·

Archives

07 October 2005 by AJ

So this is a commitment to freedom ?

Tectonic has a story running about Steve Balmer meeting with the Deputy President. This is a very disconcerting thing, and unsurprizingly the editor Alistair, a man I’ve known for many years, atacks it with zest. In fact in all the years I have known Alistair I have never read him being so forthright before.
I sent him a mail in private with praise for the piece, but considdering it’s relevance to free and open-source software as well as to related ideas like free culture, I felt it worth giving him a plug here. Artists have as much too fear from deals like this as programmers do – and we ought to be on the same side after all (and I say this as somebody who considders myself to be both of the above).

Posted in AJ Venter, theory, uncategorical ·

Archives

05 October 2005 by AJ

Are we really that special ?

Well are we ?
Let’s see. What are the great unique achievements of mankind ? Technology. Crime. Murder. Sex for pleasure. Rape. War. Advanced language.
That does seem to be about it. So lets look at them.

* Technology: Well some other creatures are tool users, but indeed no other species have taken tool use to anything like the levels we have.
* Crime: This is almost really unique, in other social animals rulebreaking is very rare – it’s usually too dangerous. When it is risked it is usually a sign of a coming usurption attempt. Humans just break the rules because we can, for a milion reasons, the rarest of which is probably that we believe the particular law to be wrong and want to replace/become the government.
* Murder: Again, not unique, other creatures of this planet do kill and they do kill their own kind. In fact every species does, it’s debatable however if any of them do it as often as we do… oh wait, spiders and mantisses kill their mates – that’s gotta up the numbers. Mother scorpions look so protective with their babies on their backs – false image actually, she isn’t carrying them – they are hiding. If one falls off, he is mommy’s lunch. What we can say is that we, without a doubt, have the highest rate of killing both of ourselves and of other species of any known vertebrate.
* Sex for pleasure: Everybody knows that animals just do it when their fertile without giving it much thought and purely to procreate right ? Sorry, another fairy tale. Chimps and Dolphins also have sex purely for pleasure, outside of eustrace periods. Well not all chimps, only the Bonobo’s actually, our closest genetic relatives. And they got the whole shebang, masturbation, foreplay, mutliple position (in trees too !) and yes orgies – a film of bonobo’s in their natural habitat could be mistaken for a porn film for people with a hair fetish. Their entire society is built upon sex. It reminds me of my all-time favorite line from star trek. “They make love at the drop of a hat”, “Any hat”. In fact, their life of serial sexual encounters pretty much whenever their not eating (their world is to them a paradise with little to fear and no starvation) is probably exactly how we used to be. Until we decided to walk on two legs and go live in grass with lions anyway. By the way, bonobo’s with their free practise of a society built on sex, well they don’t seem to care much about genders, both females and males frequently give sexual pleasure to their own genders. Our closest family on this planet are a race of bisexual perverts who average over 100 sexual encounters with different partners of inconsequential gender every single day.
* Rape, rape is the counterpoint to sex for pleasure. With the practise comes the need for consent. It’s absense is one of the worst crimes one human can do against another. Whatever the rapists and victims gender, rape is guaranteed to cause trauma, it’s the ultimate betrayal of trust. Bononbo’s don’t have rape, they get around the need for it by never saying no. Unlike humans they really are always in the mood and always consent. Yet they do have initial approaches to test for willingness. Even though they reaction has never been known to have been a no, they nevertheless ask consent, quite moral of them eh. However just as we think that there is something unique to us, uhoh. Remember there is a third species here that has sex for pleasure. They are not as closely related to us genetically as bonobo’s but they have bigger brains and their social structure bears more resemblance to ours actually. They are also one of the only species of wild animal that seeks out human contact willingly and frequently. They are of course dolphins. And dolphins do rape. They gang-rape. Gangs of young male dolphins are known to corner of a young female and serially rape her.
* War, ah yes war. War is almost unknown among vertebrates, territorial struggles exist but are rarely if ever fatal for any members of the packs fighting. War is not just murder, it is murder squared. Murder justified for some reason and done on massive scales. Only a few other species practise it, ants being a notable example. What all the war-mongering species have in common is that they are not thinking species, they are species that blindly obey orders – orders themselves created from a blind following of instinct. Perhaps there is a lesson there. The only other species with soldiers, are worse than sheep, killing without thinking about it. Following orders without caring. They show a remarkable and sad resemblence to the state human beings enter whenever war happens to us.
* Advanced language. Well other species have languages. Chimps, elephants, dolphins, wales pretty much every intelligent species can communicate with others. But nobody does it like we do. We took language to a whole new level, a level where it occupies more than 30% of our physical brainspace. It is the tool we use to study the world (mathematics is just a language) so in fact we have technology like we do purely because we have language like we do. We have poetry, stories, conversations, fights, and yes even blog posts.

So are we special ? Not as special as we like to think, but we do have one thing that nothing else has. We can truly communicate with each other, we can convey meaning better than anything else alive. So most of the things we usually think of as uniquely human are horrible and we end up feeling grateful that they aren’t uniquely human. It turns out there is only one thing that we have and no other species has. This is of course love. I don’t care what scientists say about this – I’ve heard the arguments and it’s bullshit they can’t find the explanantion (because their looking in the wrong place) so they discount it’s existence. You can measure a lot of brain activity of of someone in love and conclude that they are merely horny and jealous but like I said – you’re looking in the wrong place. You’re like Terry Practchet’s ‘auditors’ breaking paintings and sculptures down to look for beauty. Love is real, it’s the only thing (in it’s many incarnations) that is truly unique to us. We don’t have sex just for pleasure, well we do but sometimes we do it to show love. Love is our most powerful invention. I think we made love. We made it out of a combination of advanced language and sex for pleasure. Advanced language allowed us to share and bond with another human in ways no other species can match. Sex for pleasure allowed us to show the intensity of the resulting emotions through an act of ultimate caring and kindess. Put them together and you have the little starting blocks love was built out of, but synergetically it has become so much more than it’s constituent parts.
Then when we had love, love started guiding things other than our bonding with one other person. It became our prime motivator, the happiest people do their dayjobs because they love what they do. As a member of the Brazilian ministry of culture pointed out once: the root word for amatuer is amor – love. The greatest professionals are the amatuers, the ones who do it for love.
And we also mixed love with tool use. We started using tools to create new ways to convey love, a new language form where all the words mean love. This new language is art. And yes I do believe every artwork ultimately means love. A warpainting, why would it move us if we didn’t care for the people it showed, or the ideals they stood for ? Why would we bother to paint it? We paint warpaintings out of love for someone or something. That too me is the beauty of art. I didn’t list it on top because art is not something uniquely human, it is unique to ius, but is isn’t something. The reason ever art student spends two years debating the definition of art and never finding a good answer is because art isn’t something, art is a language, and the language is made up entirely of an infinity of synonyms for the word love and since you can never convince me that we can ever have enough ways to say I love you you can never convince me that we don’t need art – we need it more than we need everything else together.

Posted in AJ Venter, re-blog tidbits ·

Archives

04 October 2005 by AJ

Stories about roosters

Nathaniel and I met at the Creative Commons conference in May and had been planning a cross-blog thing since then, which due to some very bad interference from the world never realized. The worst of which was of course Nathaniel falling ill, and of course everyone here will agree that we’re really glad he’s better now. A lot of what you need to know about Nathaniel you can determine from the fact that he posted his own welcome on silentcoder.co.za, a lot of what you need to know about me, you can determine from the fact that I’m not going to post a welcome. Having given you this short bit. Let’s jump right into something. Tonight I am invited to a cocktail party in Sandton as a speaker for the ACT summit(my slot is Friday morning, drop by if you wanna meet me). I have never been to a cocktail party. The invitation says, "Wear business dress" What exactly IS business dress ? Well I suppose a suit right… erm until a month ago I didn’t even OWN a suit, and the one I have now I only bought because I was best man at a wedding and did not wish to offend anybody. My typical style is a funky slogan t-shirt and black jeans, simple, and in my own way stylish (or at least, unique which is quite probably better) Being (by choice) rather unfamiliar with the upper echelons of the business world, I am thinking of it as a sort of exploration. Like Indiana Jones and the temple of doom except with free drinks. What do the owners of multimilion dollar corporations discuss over social drinking ? I volunteer to venture forth into their domain and find out. Should I not make it back, please tell Silvia I love her, and the little bottle with the coloured sand pictures is hers no matter what my parents say. If I survive, I’ll report back.

Posted in AJ Venter, creative commons, pop culture, uncategorical ·
Newer posts →
RSS feed
Email list
Amazon
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Visit Us
LinkedIn
Google+
Google+
Academia.edu
YouTube
YouTube
Instagram
Flickr
Wikipedia

about the author

nathaniel stern is an awkward artist, writer, and teacher, who likes awkward art, writing, and students.

blog feed | email me

nathaniel’s books

Facebook

Facebook
My Tweets

categories

archives

Tags

aesthetics alice wilds art artist feature avant-garde books briefiew coding comics concern culture digital studio drawing ecology engineering fantasy fiction goods for me google ilona andrews jon horvath kate daniels milwaukee mo gawdat nathaniel stern paduak philosophy public property reading review sean slemon self-enjoyment Steve Martin syllabus sharing teaching technology TED TEDx trees urban fantasy web-comics webcomics whitehead world after us writing
nathanielstern.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc, or its affiliates. Additionally, third party vendors, including Google (the adsense bits), use cookies to serve ads based on a user's prior visits to this website. Google's use of advertising cookies enables it and its partners to serve ads to you based on your visit to this sites and/or other sites on the Internet. You may opt out of personalized advertising by visiting Ads Settings and/or www.aboutads.info.

All content © 2025 by implicit art. Base WordPress Theme by Graph Paper Press