implicit art

art and ecology, fiction and geek stuff, culture and philosophy, parenting and life, etc

implicit art

news and politics

Archives

23 March 2006 by nathaniel

The New American Myth

One of the greatest Myths propagated by the contemporary American neo-conservative powers that be is the idea that Democracy and Capitalism are one and the same, that the former cannot exist without the latter, and, most dangerously, that big company-led Capitalism Uber Alles actually leads to, promotes and protects what the Founding Fathers intended for our Democracy.

Yes, most developed and Democratic countries are regarded as capitalist, but the vast majority of them have some “combination of mixed economies, government-owned means of production, economic interventionism” (paraphrased from Wikipedia) and/or various socialist-inspired policies that insure the well being of their citizens and the world.

The Conservative movement, at least the version I grew up with, used to be based on a core value of small government – a kind of overarching mistrust of big powerhouses that controlled everything. In a government of, by and for the people, it seemed in line with the Revolutionary “no taxation without representation,” except that Conservatives wanted, both, little taxation, and small government: control of your own money, choices, rules – an almost libertarian approach to decision-making, with the occasional foray into public safety (such as Nixon’s commitment to the environment).

But two groups have mostly taken over the Conservative agenda since the 80s: the Christian Right and Corporate America. The former was needed as a base simply to win votes, and is mostly kept happy with ideological rhetoric and a faux born again Christian in the White House (“I guess I’m more of a practical fellow,” in response to the Biblical / Rapture questions around the War on Terror this week). The latter is far more dangerous.

Ironically, the Christian Right goes against my aforementioned base Conservative values. It wants government to restrict a woman’s right to choose, and take rights away from same sex couples, for example. These have become part of core Neo-Conservatism over the years.

But Big Business actually takes hypocrisy to whole new levels. Of course, they are fully behind exporting Democracy (Capitalism). The Iraq war turned, and continues to turn, huge profits for the likes of Halliburton et al, and was also meant to insure oil in our futures, McDonald’s and Coca-Cola in Iraq’s.

On the one hand, we have a 9 trillion dollar deficit, warrant-less wire-tapping, unprovoked war, an obliteration of checks and balances, not to mention the ridiculous subsidies Big Farmers get in our “Free Trade” – basically, the biggest government (and debt) in the history of our nation.

On the other, we have these same “Conservatives” screaming for tax cuts, no regulation on things like pollution, the only developed nation without universal health care – all in the guise of small government.

In between, we have a media mostly maintained by the same corporate sponsors who lobby in Washington by making “donations” to our governmental “representatives” – leaving very little room for accountability.

This is not conspiracy theory; this is Capitalism in the guise of Democratic policy, and it’s no longer controlled by The People if The People are misinformed. In a country where Democracy = Capitalism, Power and Freedom are inextricably linked to Capital: dollars and cents. The main links holding the Neo-Con agenda together are, simply, Corporate America profits. Corporate America has become the powerhouse Conservatism always warned against; but since they are one and the same, they are not complaining.

At a distance, I’m beginning to mourn for my birth-country. We are fighting for principles we do not uphold; we are giving up Freedoms in the name of Freedom; we are enabling commercials to sell us lies, and user-tested rhetoric and taglines to define our government. This is not Democracy; it’s 1984.

If you are not angry, you are not paying attention.

Posted in news and politics, pop culture, theory, uncategorical ·

Archives

15 March 2006 by nathaniel

Censure

Not a huge moveon fan myself – they just send too many annoying emails – but at this point, I’d do everything and anything in my power to support Feingold’s resolution.

Subject: Censure President Bush

Hi,

Yesterday, Senator Russ Feingold introduced a resolution to censure President Bush for breaking the law by illegally wiretapping American citizens.

When the president misleads the public and the Congress and willfully and repeatedly breaks the law, there need to be some consequences –that’s how the law works for everybody else.

Censuring the president is a reasonable first step in condemning the president’s actions. Now it’s up to us to show broad public support for Senator Feingold’s resolution. Can you sign this petition asking Congress to join the call for censure?

http://political.moveon.org/censure/

Thanks!

Posted in news and politics, pop culture, re-blog tidbits, uncategorical ·

Archives

09 March 2006 by nathaniel

O…M…G

Now, I don’t feel as if I have a choice. I need more bandwidth. It’s time. Did you hear that both The Daily Show and The Colbert Report are now both available from iTunes?

Posted in news and politics, pop culture, re-blog tidbits, stimulus, technology ·

Archives

08 March 2006 by nathaniel

PLAGIARISM AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT OF GERHARD MARX’S WORK

From Warren Siebrits:

On Sunday, 19 February 2006, an ad campaign “created” by advertising agency Ireland-Davenport, for their client BMW South Africa, appeared reproduced full page in numerous Sunday newspapers.
 
This advert depicting a female nude observed from behind, has been composed very closely in style and concept to that of Gerhard Marx. Not only is the advertisement a direct rip-off of Marx’s signature style, but the advert is also composed using reconstituted map fragments which is the cornerstone of Marx’s expression. Neither Gerhard Marx, nor the Gallery authorized any reproduction or simulation of his work to either BMW South Africa or Ireland-Davenport.

Marx is a young South African contemporary artist, theatre director and scenographer who pioneered this form of visual expression five years ago in 2001. In the catalogue for his previous exhibition held at our gallery in November 2005 there is an extensive interview reproduced where the artist discusses the invention of this technique along with illustrations of some of his earliest works in this style dating from 2002. The entire publication along with all Marx’s images are clearly copyrighted, with permission expressly requested for the use of any material pertaining to Marx’s work.
 
As the representatives of Gerhard Marx’s work, it is our opinion that this campaign grossly plagiarizes and infringes on Gerhard Marx’s creative and intellectual domain. We have therefore decided to take legal action against BMW South Africa and Ireland-Davenport and have appointed the services of Dr Owen Dean of Spoor and Fisher.
 
Enquiries Warren Siebrits or Lunetta Bartz 011 327 0000.

(detail) SHEET # 2 : HORIZONTAL FIGURE 2 cut and reconstituted map fragments 38 x 141cm
(detail) SHEET # 2 : HORIZONTAL FIGURE 2 cut and reconstituted map fragments 38 x 141cm

Posted in art, news and politics, pop culture, re-blog tidbits, south african art, uncategorical ·

Archives

03 March 2006 by nathaniel

Whitney Biennial 2006: Day for Night

Granted, this is mostly a re-blog of some links I got from Art Fag City and MTAA-RR (two of my favorite blogs – and don’t miss the MTAA Upgrade! at Wits this afternoon!), but there are some great posts / reviews already up on the Whitney Biennial. The basic gist is that there are some newbies (which is nice), it is mostly courageous and slightly un-American, it kinda sucks (what else is new?), and they should have asked me for work. Everyone is agreed on that last point.

I think I like some of Jerry Saltz’s review for a start, from artnet:

"Day for Night" is the liveliest, brainiest, most self-conscious Whitney Biennial I have ever seen. In some ways it isn’t a biennial at all. Curators Chrissie Iles and Philippe Vergne have cleverly re-branded the biennial, presenting a thesis not a snap-shot, a proposition about art in a time when modernism is history and postmodernist rhetoric feels played out. This show and the art world are trying to do what America can’t or won’t do: Use its power wisely, innovatively and with attitude — be engaged and above all not define being a citizen of the world narrowly.

"Day for Night" is filled with work I’m not interested in; it tries to do too much in too little space; it is often dry and confusing. Nevertheless, the show is a compelling attempt to examine conceptual practices and political agency, consider art that is not about beauty, reconsider reductivism, explore the possibility of an underground in plain sight, probe pre-modern and archaic approaches, posit destruction and chaos as creative forces, and revisit ideas about obfuscation and anonymity. This show is less market-driven than usual; in fact it attempts to cross swords with conventions that have brought us to the brink of madness. It’s also an anti-manifesto taking on romanticism, expressionism and decorative psychedelia.
…
This biennial is positively un-American.

I should note that there’s a bit of a double entendre there, in that there are lots of foreigners on the show, compared to usual (um, none), and there are more than a few political pieces. Then, there’s this interview with the curators, which had some interesting bits in it, but I could only skim (something is wrong when art bores me… I just tried again, and there are still some interesting bits and it still kinda bored me). Not a terrible intro tho, "In an undertaking described by Whitney directorr Adam Weinberg as “absorbing the immediacy of artists’ responses to the world,” the curators have focused on notions of uncertain identity, unfixed images, “lavish abandon,” ambiguity and a sense of social and political questioning as evidenced in contemporary art." Look, ma! I can be ambiguous (indifferent?) about ambiguity!

There’re some interesting concerns on bloggy, extensive (but not so great) pics on Heart As Arena, and a slightly hilarious (tho again, boring at points) mash-up (14MB) on Art Dirt Redux. (For those not in the know, definition of mash-up aka bastard pop – we’re latecomers in Africa).

I can’t help but think of my sister, who is taking her first History of Art class as she does an MFA in acting (paraphrasing here) – "Nathaniel, you make this stuff so sound cool, while these books and my lecturers make it sound boring. So, which is it?"

Good f^ck!ng question, and I’m real sorry, Sammy – maybe it’s because I never took a History of Art class? Sigh.

Posted in art, art and tech, news and politics, pop culture, re-blog tidbits, reviews, stimulus, theory, uncategorical ·

Archives

02 March 2006 by nathaniel

Beeldspraak

Beeldsprak: all 52 prints
Beeldsprak: Beeld "newspaper curated" (by Gordon Froud) exhibition at the University of Johannesburg gallery.

I hit the University of Johannesburg Gallery last night – a beautiful new space with an interesting outside – for the Gordon Froud curated Beeldspraak. The exhibition is a culmination of 52 weeks worth of a "newspaper exhibition." Gordon proposed (first somewhere else, which rejected him – but he did not say where) to have 52 different artists each contribute one work over the course of a year, and every Tuesday it would be printed in the paper and catalyze discussion. It led to a beautifully diverse exhibition that really does capture the vibes of contemporary South African art, albeit in a 2D-only space. The most wonderful part – aside from the original works being donated towards a good cause and auctioned off over the next few weeks – is that each contributing artist receives one set of all 52 limited edition prints, now selling for R6000.

I’m glad I played a part! See it.

Posted in art, art and tech, flickr, me, news and politics, pop culture, reviews, south african art, stimulus, technology, uncategorical ·
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

Tags

aesthetics alice wilds art artist feature avant-garde books briefiew coding comics concern culture digital studio drawing ecology engineering fantasy fiction goods for me google ilona andrews jon horvath kate daniels milwaukee mo gawdat nathaniel stern paduak philosophy public property reading review sean slemon self-enjoyment Steve Martin syllabus sharing teaching technology TED TEDx trees urban fantasy web-comics webcomics whitehead world after us writing

nathaniel’s books

Interactive Art and Embodiment book cover
Interactive Art and Embodiment: the implicit body as performance

from Amazon.com

Buy Interactive Art for $30 directly from the publisher

Ecological Aesthetics book cover
Ecological Aesthetics: artful tactics for humans, nature, and politics

from Amazon.com

All content © 2026 by implicit art. Base WordPress Theme by Graph Paper Press