implicit art

art and ecology, fiction and geek stuff, culture and philosophy, parenting and life, etc

implicit art

art and tech

Archives

21 October 2005 by nathaniel

impact / kontakt

Thomas Kilpper, don.t look back
Thomas Kilpper’s don’t look back at the impact festival biennale a few weeks ago, Berlin / Poznan

Local hero, Richard Kilpert (note similarity in name to Thomas Kilpper, artist shown), gave a talk about his great experiences at the Impact Printmaking festival/conference a few weeks ago. The conference, whose title and theme was ‘kontact,’ brought print specialists to, and between, Berlin, Germany and Poznan, Poland. His talk was for an hour yesterday afternoon at Wits, and this is one of Rich’s slides.

Thomas Kilpper’s don’t look back, 22 x 12 meters(!), is a (ridiculously) large-scale wood cut, produced by carving a relief image into a basketball court – just before the building was to be renovated. Approximately six pain-staking months were spent chipping away before Kilpper inked up and produced this beauty, above.

Richard Kilpert later gave me a ride to the airport (I’m blogging from the airport! Not a big deal to you first-worlders, but I am in Africa, baby!), on my way to Durban for Colleen Alborough’s opening – thanks, buddy. Zululand, here I come….

Posted in art, art and tech, south african art, technology ·

Archives

21 October 2005 by AJ

I feel cheated.

While Nathaniel is working on the new servers, I felt I would try to post something entertaining, which nevertheless wasn’t a crisis if it got lost. A re-blog was the obvious choice. So herewith, a little something I wrote a couple of weeks ago.

—-
“Apollo 11 was ten years ahead of schedule – that means as an author, I have to adjust all my timelines, we’re on the moon and it’s 1969 – that means that what I predicted for 2001 is now suddenly more likely to exist in 1981” – Arthur C. Clarke, author of 2001 – A space oddesey, October 3rd 1969.

I feel cheated.

It’s now 2006. Not only are we not anywhere near the tech that we Clarke anticipated for 1981, we didn’t even get there in 2001. Where’s my jetcar ? I want my lasergun damnit ! Oh and those x-ray glasses… mmm…
But I digress. What went wrong ? A hundred and fifty years ago the first scifi author (unless you count Dante) Jules Verne wrote a manuscript called “Paris 1939”. He predicts a city where people drive cars (this appears to be the first usage of the phrase ‘horseless carriage’) and filled with electric lights everywhere – including streetlamps. Since the lightbulb wasn’t even invented yet. His publisher refused to print the book calling it “just too farfetched”. His daughter inherrited the manuscript who passed it on to her daughter, who published it to “rectify the acuracy of grand-dads storytelling vission”
Former South African Minister of the external, Pik Botha was a writer before entering politics. In 1951 he writes a story called (translation): The value of a heart. In this story, he has Joseph Stalin undergo a heart transplant. Once more the story remained unpublished for being “too unlikely”. So Mr. Botha left scifi and spent the rest of his short writing career doing romances and (rather silly) detective stories.
Less than 10 years later, the first heart transplant happened right here in South Africa.

So SCIFI authors have predicted some things remarkably well. Yet amazingly, the best of the best just doesn’t seem to match. Most profound innovation of the end of the twentieth century – the personal computer. Nobody, not one saw that one coming. They all worried about the giant computers in the corps getting too powerfull – nobody saw the ones in our homes.
Once they were there, the next great predictions were wearable computing (watches that think), and voice recognition. So far those two have materialized, but been rather a let-down (though wearable computing is growing).
So the greatest inventions, they didn’t even expect (somehow none of the scifi writers, renegades that they are, and inspiration to renegades – ever really believed in the renegades who read them, for it was those renegades (particularly Steve Wozniak) who brought us the one thing no company on earth would have thought could be sold), and we got none of their greatest promisses.

There is no reliable cryogenics system for multicelled creatures. There is no cure for cancer yet. The flying car is still just something you see in movies. Personal space travel is just a dream, and even the X-prize won’t change that very soon. The world where space ships are as simple a piece of ownership as a car today is still as far away as ever.

What’s worse, we are still stuck on some things which scientists and scifi authors called “outdated” fourty years ago. Most notably the internal combustion engin – and fossil fuels. Things which we already have better alternatives for. The cheapest being methane conversion for any car. Methane is free – governments are only too greatfull to get rid of what to them is just a waste product, you can today, for a small outlay convert any car to run on a free fuel that causes absolutely no polution. Yet there are less than 100 of them in the world.
The reason is simple: politics. Political pressure by large oil companies (and countries) keep us dead set on a course of self-destruction when we have multiple ways out – the methane conversion is just the most easilly and immediately viable.
Of course they tell you there are safety issues – as if those didn’t exist in gasoline cars earlier – fix them ! It’s easier than an electric car that still needs to have a polluting power plant somewhere.

I feel cheated. What the hell happened to the world ? The IT industry has been through dosens, that’s dosens of major revolutions in the past fourty years. Vaccuum tubes became transistors became microchips became microcomputers became home computers. Punch card binary became assembler became top down programming became modular programming became object orientation.
And even now we are on the verge of the next major breakthrough – practical nanotech, and quite likely not too long after that, quantum computing.
So why the hell are cars still essentially the same as they were in 1893 ? Why on earth are powerplants still basically what they were in 1925 ?
Innovation has not stopped, if anything the pace has picked up – but where we needed it most, it hasn’t happened. I don’t buy it. Something else is stopping the innovations from realizing into products. Something with power and money and a vested interest in the status quo – which leaves not too many usual suspects !!
I feel cheated.
The world has been cheated.
We’ve been cheated out of our very future.
Any chance you think that we can still wake up in time to take it back ?

Posted in AJ Venter, art and tech, re-blog tidbits, uncategorical ·

Archives

20 October 2005 by nathaniel

more from apple

Apple’s got new Power Mac (desktops) and PowerBook (laptops) models, as well as aperture: iPhoto on steroids.

Yummy, me wants….

Posted in art and tech, technology, uncategorical ·

Archives

19 October 2005 by nathaniel

Anne McIlleron @ Goodman Gallery

Wanted Everything, a projection by Anne McIlleron @ the Goodman Gallery
Wanted Everything, a projection by Anne McIlleron @ the Goodman Gallery

Photographs, video stills, projections and text pieces concerned “with light, colour and indeterminacy is the impulse for much of Anne Mcllleron’Äôs work” – so it says on the Goodman Gallery site. Anne, who is most well-known for winning the new media category in the first Brett Kebble Art Awards, and as William Kentridge’s assistant, will be showing at the Goodman until 29 October.

Pictured above is Wanted Everything, the stunning title work from her show; it’s a text animation, seemingly water-like, projected in a glass bowl. The photos presented at the fore of the gallery seem to be at the very early stages of something, but Anne’s other work – the rest of the show – is quite beautiful. I find this particularly true of her subtle projections and map-like text-work.

Posted in art, art and tech, south african art ·

Archives

17 October 2005 by nathaniel

Marco Cianfanelli @ Gallery Momo

Marco Cianfanelli @ Gallery Momo
left: Marco Cianfanelli @ Gallery Momo.
Each sculpture shown is Untitled, 2005

Altho I could have done without his video piece (and the rest of his work could then have been spread out more, using the blocked out room), this is an absolutely stunning show of emotive and quirky sculptures and sculpture-like, um, thingers. It’s a Joburg must-see. From the Gallery Momo site:

Cianfanelli continues his exploration of computer aided design in the realisation of his work. He is exploring new ground in terms of exploiting that data to inform and understand new forms and meaning. Measurement has become a key instrument for the artist, who has come to the conclusion that the digital realm is merely an evolution of the first moment when humans started to measure the world around them. In addition digitally designed and precision laser cut form is no longer an end product but potentially a starting point to configuring work.

Over the past ten years, Cianfanelli has explored various possibilities for artistic intervention in the public and commercial realm. This activity has developed to the point that not only has the gap between gallery and project work narrowed but project work has reached a level of sophistication that it has started to inform and develop the artist’Äôs work produced purely for exhibition.

Posted in art, art and tech, south african art, technology ·

Archives

17 October 2005 by nathaniel

Doina Kraal @ The Drill Hall (update)

New/better image © Christo Doherty – thanks Christo!
Doina Kraal at the Drill Hall
Doina Kraal @ The Drill Hall, image © Christo Doherty. It’s Simon Gush’s fault that I don’t know the installation’s title. Be angry at him.

A small gathering of local artists, scholars and art appreciators showed up for Doina Kraal’s short-lived installation at the Drill Hall last night, at around eight PM. It only opened on Wednesday and closed last night (and my “source” – hee – doesn’t know the title), but I’m so glad I made the effort to visit (thanks, Christo, for the ride!).

My image, as usual, does no justice. There were basically six cut outs and six slide projections of trees, nearly matched up, and spread spaciously throughout the room. Wind, people, and anything effecting the air made both the suspended projections, and their similarly hung “screens,” move ever so slightly. And since I love Elizabeth Ermarth so much, I’ll quote her and say, “I swing therefore I am.”

Subtle and beautiful.

Posted in art, art and tech ·
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

Tags

aesthetics alice wilds art artist feature avant-garde books briefiew coding comics concern culture digital studio drawing ecology engineering fantasy fiction goods for me google ilona andrews jon horvath kate daniels milwaukee mo gawdat nathaniel stern paduak philosophy public property reading review sean slemon self-enjoyment Steve Martin syllabus sharing teaching technology TED TEDx trees urban fantasy web-comics webcomics whitehead world after us writing

nathaniel’s books

Interactive Art and Embodiment book cover
Interactive Art and Embodiment: the implicit body as performance

from Amazon.com

Buy Interactive Art for $30 directly from the publisher

Ecological Aesthetics book cover
Ecological Aesthetics: artful tactics for humans, nature, and politics

from Amazon.com

All content © 2026 by implicit art. Base WordPress Theme by Graph Paper Press