implicit art

art and ecology, fiction and geek stuff, culture and philosophy, parenting and life, etc

implicit art
18 February 2009 by nathaniel

Wikipedia Art: so irrelevant we can’t stop talking about it (updated)

More 50-50, keep / delete discussions around Wikipedia Art, but now the debate is on Rhizome, and by the gatekeepers of, and participants in, the art blogosphere. I particularly love Curt Cloninger’s response to Tom Moody on Rhizome. Moody is a kind of anti-Lichty, being just as voiciferous in his dislike of the project, as Lichty has with regards to what he deems as its importance. Yay, platform. Happy to provide it for both of you. You’re great collaborators.

iDC discussion has some nice tidbits, too.

RSS feed
Email list
Amazon
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Visit Us
LinkedIn
Google+
Google+
Academia.edu
YouTube
YouTube
Instagram
Flickr
Wikipedia
Posted in art, art and tech, creative commons, me, milwaukee art, pop culture, re-blog tidbits, reviews, south african art, stimulus, technology, theory, uncategorical. RSS 2.0 feed.
« Durova: Wikipedia Art and media restoration
xkcd – A Webcomic – Neutrality Schmeutrality »

Categories

Tags

aesthetics alice wilds art artist feature avant-garde books briefiew coding comics concern culture digital studio drawing ecology engineering fantasy fiction goods for me google ilona andrews jon horvath kate daniels milwaukee mo gawdat nathaniel stern paduak philosophy public property reading review sean slemon self-enjoyment Steve Martin syllabus sharing teaching technology TED TEDx trees urban fantasy web-comics webcomics whitehead world after us writing

nathaniel’s books

Interactive Art and Embodiment book cover
Interactive Art and Embodiment: the implicit body as performance

from Amazon.com

Buy Interactive Art for $30 directly from the publisher

Ecological Aesthetics book cover
Ecological Aesthetics: artful tactics for humans, nature, and politics

from Amazon.com

All content © 2025 by implicit art. Base WordPress Theme by Graph Paper Press