I am not, and probably will never consider myself, a "conservative" – tho I know not what that means in today’s American climate. Still, as many Dems cower before the current administration, it has been the reasonable few, on "both sides" of the political spectrum, who speak volumes of truth. Here’s Andrew’s response to a Republican naysayer on his site (Andrew is and has always been a conservative, and former hero of the Republican party):
I believe in an aggressive fight against our enemy. I would have sent twice the number of troops to Iraq. I’d add a war-tax to gasoline. I would have expended whatever resources needed to find and kill Osama bin Laden. I’m in favor of an aggressive, dynamic, enterprising war against these barbarians. But I believe that part of that long war is continuing to insist on humane treatment of prisoners of war. And I believe that the laws of warfare need to be written and, if necessary, adjusted, to fight this new war. So I’d be happy to see the 1978 FISA law amended to make it easier to wiretap genuine security threats. I have no problem with the Swift program. I’d be happy to see enemy combatants detained indefinitely as prisoners of war, if so proved under a fair process.
Where I dissent is in the claim to grant the president extra-constitutional monarchical power to make this stuff up as he goes along, and to shred the Anglo-American principles of justice and war-making at the same time. I also believe that the United States must never torture any prisoner of war or enemy combatant, and must always treat them humanely. Real intelligence is gained by steady and long-term infiltration of terror networks, not crude torture of random individuals in dark cells. So let us fight by using our strengths – an executive whose errors are subject to checks from both judiciary and legislature and a free, robust press. That’s a democracy’s advantage in wartime over dictatorships – an openness to internal criticism and thereby correction. The results of one man deciding everything are already evident in the shambles of the Iraq invasion. We are better than that – and it befuddles me to see how little faith some "conservatives" now have in the procedures of constitutional democracy.
Read more from Andrew’s Daily Dish.
One Response to Andrew Sullivan is very cool