Comments on: we apologize (updated) http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2008/07/17/we-apologize/ implications since february two thousand and three Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:09:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 By: Bush_h8r http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2008/07/17/we-apologize/comment-page-1/#comment-354182 Bush_h8r Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:03:22 +0000 http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2008/07/17/we-apologize/#comment-354182 Bush was a horrid president. He was ignoring evidence that something horrible like 9-11 was going to happen. He also lied. Bush was a horrid president. He was ignoring evidence that something horrible like 9-11 was going to happen. He also lied.

]]> By: Dider http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2008/07/17/we-apologize/comment-page-1/#comment-354176 Dider Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:20:08 +0000 http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2008/07/17/we-apologize/#comment-354176 That's so ridiculous... Where they would put the obama's sign? Indonesia? everyone bought he's from hawaii....lol That’s so ridiculous…

Where they would put the obama’s sign?

Indonesia? everyone bought he’s from hawaii….lol

]]> By: Time Warrior http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2008/07/17/we-apologize/comment-page-1/#comment-354146 Time Warrior Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:31:49 +0000 http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2008/07/17/we-apologize/#comment-354146 This would rock if they really did this. Perhaps this should be emailed to the Governor of that state! Hahaha! This would rock if they really did this. Perhaps this should be emailed to the Governor of that state! Hahaha!

]]> By: nathaniel http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2008/07/17/we-apologize/comment-page-1/#comment-353673 nathaniel Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:10:52 +0000 http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2008/07/17/we-apologize/#comment-353673 Wow! Homophobia, unsubstantiated argumentation, AND passive aggression all in one comment! Hooray for the party of Sarah Palin! Wow! Homophobia, unsubstantiated argumentation, AND passive aggression all in one comment! Hooray for the party of Sarah Palin!

]]> By: Bush lover http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2008/07/17/we-apologize/comment-page-1/#comment-353672 Bush lover Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:27:34 +0000 http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2008/07/17/we-apologize/#comment-353672 That is really gay, and stupid Bush is the best president ever! Why don't you run for president then. That is really gay, and stupid Bush is the best president ever! Why don’t you run for president then.

]]> By: nathaniel http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2008/07/17/we-apologize/comment-page-1/#comment-306311 nathaniel Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:46:14 +0000 http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2008/07/17/we-apologize/#comment-306311 Sorry if you feel insulted, Rick; it's unintentional on my part. Honestly, given mash-up and internet culture and the contemporary language of images, I didn't think it that important whether or not this was "real," and I guess that could be read as conflicting - I thought it might be real, but didn't really think it affected the power of the image, and only looked it up when someone else asked. I read Joy's comment as a kind of playful banter along these same linesand went a long with it. And I put the link and text in the post because I didn't want to perpetuate any arguments; but again, I think the image is no less powerful or funny simply because it was photoshopped. Sorry if you feel insulted, Rick; it’s unintentional on my part. Honestly, given mash-up and internet culture and the contemporary language of images, I didn’t think it that important whether or not this was “real,” and I guess that could be read as conflicting - I thought it might be real, but didn’t really think it affected the power of the image, and only looked it up when someone else asked. I read Joy’s comment as a kind of playful banter along these same linesand went a long with it. And I put the link and text in the post because I didn’t want to perpetuate any arguments; but again, I think the image is no less powerful or funny simply because it was photoshopped.

]]> By: Rick http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2008/07/17/we-apologize/comment-page-1/#comment-305984 Rick Sat, 09 Aug 2008 23:54:55 +0000 http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2008/07/17/we-apologize/#comment-305984 I'm confused by your follow-up post to Joy. It seems as though you are agreeing with her, if I read this correctly, that you believe that I was "thick" for believing in the accuracy of the sign. I appreciate that you indicated on the front page that it is a mash-up but it looks as though you were also "think" as you admitted in your comment of July 31 that you too thought it was real. I apologize in advance if I misunderstood your or Joy's comments. I’m confused by your follow-up post to Joy. It seems as though you are agreeing with her, if I read this correctly, that you believe that I was “thick” for believing in the accuracy of the sign. I appreciate that you indicated on the front page that it is a mash-up but it looks as though you were also “think” as you admitted in your comment of July 31 that you too thought it was real. I apologize in advance if I misunderstood your or Joy’s comments.

]]> By: nathaniel http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2008/07/17/we-apologize/comment-page-1/#comment-302876 nathaniel Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:09:09 +0000 http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2008/07/17/we-apologize/#comment-302876 joy: it seems they are. thanks for the re-blog by the way. anyhow, i've added that it's a mash-up / fake in the main part of the post.... joy: it seems they are. thanks for the re-blog by the way. anyhow, i’ve added that it’s a mash-up / fake in the main part of the post….

]]>