<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: smith and western</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2007/04/02/smith-and-western/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2007/04/02/smith-and-western/</link>
	<description>implications since february two thousand and three</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 21:31:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathaniel</title>
		<link>http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2007/04/02/smith-and-western/comment-page-1/#comment-74903</link>
		<dc:creator>nathaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2007/04/02/smith-and-western/#comment-74903</guid>
		<description>yeh, i do. i thought it smart and obviously was glad it was very positive. Not much else I can say, tho, as I&#039;m not sure if you are alluding to potential bias? if you are, yeh, I admit there might bsome, thus my disclosure... thanks for the pennies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeh, i do. i thought it smart and obviously was glad it was very positive. Not much else I can say, tho, as I&#8217;m not sure if you are alluding to potential bias? if you are, yeh, I admit there might bsome, thus my disclosure&#8230; thanks for the pennies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andanotherthing</title>
		<link>http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2007/04/02/smith-and-western/comment-page-1/#comment-74798</link>
		<dc:creator>andanotherthing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2007/04/02/smith-and-western/#comment-74798</guid>
		<description>you like the piece he wrote about you?
...ahem......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you like the piece he wrote about you?<br />
&#8230;ahem&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twopennies</title>
		<link>http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2007/04/02/smith-and-western/comment-page-1/#comment-74797</link>
		<dc:creator>twopennies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2007/04/02/smith-and-western/#comment-74797</guid>
		<description>might i just note that although this debate could verge on the tedious, i would rather read rat western&#039;s writing anyday over michael smith&#039;s.  a more entertaining and persuasive writer than she would be hard to find - certainly smith could only hope to engage and inspire a reader to even stay the course of his opus let alone agree with his argument in the way western does.  more power to her pen i say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>might i just note that although this debate could verge on the tedious, i would rather read rat western&#8217;s writing anyday over michael smith&#8217;s.  a more entertaining and persuasive writer than she would be hard to find &#8211; certainly smith could only hope to engage and inspire a reader to even stay the course of his opus let alone agree with his argument in the way western does.  more power to her pen i say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

