http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2005/12/29/wordpress-20-review-for-non-professional-bloggers/ implications since february two thousand and three Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:30:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2 http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2005/12/29/wordpress-20-review-for-non-professional-bloggers/#comment-5081 eric Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:36:45 +0000 http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2005/12/29/wordpress-20-review-for-non-professional-bloggers/#comment-5081 Yeah. There are a couple ways to insert images. From a URL and just uploading with the admin tool. That was always a huge hurdle for our authors who really didn't want to see all that HTML. This way should be much better but still a little convoluted. Yeah. There are a couple ways to insert images. From a URL and just uploading with the admin tool. That was always a huge hurdle for our authors who really didn’t want to see all that HTML. This way should be much better but still a little convoluted.

]]> http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2005/12/29/wordpress-20-review-for-non-professional-bloggers/#comment-5079 nathaniel Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:58:11 +0000 http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2005/12/29/wordpress-20-review-for-non-professional-bloggers/#comment-5079 thanks, eric. it's a good point - i vary between firefox and safari, and i plan to slowly move more to the former as i upgrade my site(s) to 2.0. while on the topic of the WYSIWYG, I found the image upload on the same page great, but the insertion into the rich editor a bit wonky.... thanks, eric. it’s a good point - i vary between firefox and safari, and i plan to slowly move more to the former as i upgrade my site(s) to 2.0. while on the topic of the WYSIWYG, I found the image upload on the same page great, but the insertion into the rich editor a bit wonky….

]]> http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2005/12/29/wordpress-20-review-for-non-professional-bloggers/#comment-5075 eric Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:41:40 +0000 http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2005/12/29/wordpress-20-review-for-non-professional-bloggers/#comment-5075 I'd just add that the WYSIWYG editor is great and the new admin features help a ton for especially for non-tech writers, but, they don't work so great or are just not there when people use a browser besides Firefox. That eliminates a lot of non-tech writers. At the Walker we are recommending our authors use Firefox anyway for our site CMS and WordPress, I'd pass that along to any one who wants to get the most features out of the Wordpress admin. I’d just add that the WYSIWYG editor is great and the new admin features help a ton for especially for non-tech writers, but, they don’t work so great or are just not there when people use a browser besides Firefox. That eliminates a lot of non-tech writers. At the Walker we are recommending our authors use Firefox anyway for our site CMS and WordPress, I’d pass that along to any one who wants to get the most features out of the Wordpress admin.

]]>