<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: wordpress 2.0 review for non-professional bloggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2005/12/29/wordpress-20-review-for-non-professional-bloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2005/12/29/wordpress-20-review-for-non-professional-bloggers/</link>
	<description>implications since february two thousand and three</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:54:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2005/12/29/wordpress-20-review-for-non-professional-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-5081</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanielstern.com/blog/?p=1008#comment-5081</guid>
		<description>Yeah. There are a couple ways to insert images. From a URL and just uploading with the admin tool. That was always a huge hurdle for our authors who really didn&#039;t want to see all that HTML. This way should be much better but still a little convoluted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. There are a couple ways to insert images. From a URL and just uploading with the admin tool. That was always a huge hurdle for our authors who really didn&#8217;t want to see all that HTML. This way should be much better but still a little convoluted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathaniel</title>
		<link>http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2005/12/29/wordpress-20-review-for-non-professional-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-5079</link>
		<dc:creator>nathaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanielstern.com/blog/?p=1008#comment-5079</guid>
		<description>thanks, eric. it&#039;s a good point - i vary between firefox and safari, and i plan to slowly move more to the former as i upgrade my site(s) to 2.0. while on the topic of the WYSIWYG, I found the image upload on the same page great, but the insertion into the rich editor a bit wonky....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks, eric. it&#8217;s a good point &#8211; i vary between firefox and safari, and i plan to slowly move more to the former as i upgrade my site(s) to 2.0. while on the topic of the WYSIWYG, I found the image upload on the same page great, but the insertion into the rich editor a bit wonky&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://nathanielstern.com/blog/2005/12/29/wordpress-20-review-for-non-professional-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-5075</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanielstern.com/blog/?p=1008#comment-5075</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d just add that the WYSIWYG editor is great and the new admin features help a ton for especially for non-tech writers, but, they don&#039;t work so great or are just not there when people use a browser besides Firefox. That eliminates a lot of non-tech writers. At the Walker we are recommending our authors use Firefox anyway for our site CMS and WordPress, I&#039;d pass that along to any one who wants to get the most features out of the Wordpress admin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d just add that the WYSIWYG editor is great and the new admin features help a ton for especially for non-tech writers, but, they don&#8217;t work so great or are just not there when people use a browser besides Firefox. That eliminates a lot of non-tech writers. At the Walker we are recommending our authors use Firefox anyway for our site CMS and WordPress, I&#8217;d pass that along to any one who wants to get the most features out of the WordPress admin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

