jetlag

Filed under:me, uncategorical — posted by nathaniel on 31 October 2005 @ 4:01 pm

Sjoe. So here I am on Staten Island. Man, I’m tired. Nicky and I arrived safely after our terrible flight, and had fantastic bagels, a nap, dinner with my ‘rents, sleep. I got my new video iPod, which is dreamy, and a few t-shirts from thinkgeek, plus my new jitter serial number and shirt (cycling74) in the mail. All my server moves are complete so I might be entering the real/physical world again shortly, tho it is still slightly fuzzy; was up at 5AM this morning, which isn’t bad, considering we only arrived yesterday. We started watching the new season of Lost, which I downloaded from iTunes (I love this new video stuff!) - what is up with that 3GB cap bullshit in SA? And talk about speed….

Oh yeh, I forgot that it’s Halloween! Probably going in for some drinks with friends and to see some of the parade in a few hours. To nap or not to nap…. Been up four hours, so I guess it’s time for breakfast. So this is America?


ewald

Filed under:kaganof, uncategorical — posted by kaganof on @ 12:11 am


the son of man

Filed under:kaganof — posted by kaganof on 30 October 2005 @ 10:07 pm

Tags:

terrible 30 hours or so

Filed under:me, uncategorical — posted by nathaniel on @ 6:11 pm

I am never flying SAA again. Jeez, that was the worst experience EVER. 3 hours waiting to get on, we had specifically requested medical seats for my wife’s back and they gave us two of the only three seats on the plane that DIDN’T recline (the worst), it now has a stop-over both ways, so is not “direct” as they claim, and another 3 hours wait on this side.

Needless to say, I have slept less than three hours in the last 30. Can you say jetlag for life?

I can’t believe I am in NYC. First thing: I just ate two bagels. Next up: a nap….


bit o’ buggery

Filed under:me, uncategorical — posted by nathaniel on 28 October 2005 @ 6:15 pm

Site stuff happening: moving servers. I’ve asked the guests not to blog in the interim, and the site might lose some posts over the next couple of days, as well as some comments; I’ll try my best to import them all again once things are resolved….. Hopefully things will work out ok in the end. FYI: email post to friend and the emailing me contact form may also be not working for two/three days. If you wanna get in touch, try me at firstname [dot] lastname [at] gmail [dot] com (replace descriptors with actual first and last name. I hate spam.).

Sorry for the inconvenience.


durban downloaded

Filed under:music, stimulus, pop culture, art, art and tech, technology, south african art — posted by nathaniel on @ 8:39 am

Just looking over the vast amounts of photos over the last few days, but have chosen to reminisce in text (remember: we’re in Africa; I like to keep file sizes down!)….

Wednesday morning began with a whole lot of gushing over Colleen Alborough’s amazing work. The production of Night Journey was a journey itself - Colleen has been working on the piece for about 3 years. But it is only with that time that the piece has come to be so amazingly well rendered, so obviously considered. The interactive elements are far superior to her last attempt (now moving to alarm motion sensors instead of motion tracking cameras), but rather than turning the piece into something playful, they push the piece towards an unrepeatable eeriness. Her felt (the material, not the action) walls and animated videos are a scary yet comfortable claustrophobia, and the lights and bodies in the space paradoxically make me feel safe, and make my skin crawl.

The next part of the morning was slightly different. We went to catch a rehearsal of Bombay Crush. You heard me right: Jay Pather, avant-garde choreographer extraordinaire, is producing a full-on Bollywood Musical. OMG it was super duper fun to watch its beginnings. Opens 1 Dec, and if time and money allow, I’m hoping to take my second-ever trip to Durban in order to see it.

Then we hit the Durban Art Gallery to see some of their permanent collection, some newly acquired works from the recent red-eye exhibition, and the positive: aids in 2005 show. The most interesting works for me were by Desmond Zeederberg, Clive van den Berg, Churchill Madikida and Wayne Barker.

Storm then took me for a bit of a tour - we hit ushaka for a walk on the pier, round the new and old architecture, through a few parks, and finally to the aquarium for a look at the fishies. There seems to be a new fascination with clown fish since the dawning of Finding Nemo, and I got to reference my / Josh Goldberg’s ‘clown joke’ far too frequently for the common man.

Day eased into night as I blogged a bit, did some personal admin online at the gallery, and prepped a small feast for our final night in Durbs. I’ll be back….


jacki

Filed under:kaganof, south african art — posted by kaganof on 27 October 2005 @ 5:33 pm


Whammy Bar - Part 2

Filed under:AJ Venter, music, art, uncategorical — posted by AJ on @ 11:45 am

Now if notation cannot even handle one of the most popular present day western instruments, imagine how bad it gets with other cultures. Bach tried to emulate tribal music - he was even further off than he thought since their entire scale system was different, he could get a near fake but the notation he worked in was simply not able to represent the melodies of his inspiration.

This is where I get annoyed by a lot of my fellow protestants, the more orthodox among them still believe that psalms must be sung to the somber orderly music of the renaiscance church. Firstly I’ll argue the “orderly”, rock has no less order in it’s structure than the others, in fact all music is equally ordered - that’s one of the basic things that make it music.
More importantly, to claim that this is higher art is ridiculous, not that some of it isn’t pretty, but it was written in a clasistic system that measured the quality of art by how difficult it was to reproduce and more importantly by the ammount of specialist training you needed to understand it. The problem with this “classical” church music is that it goes against the very grain of what protestantism is supposed to be about - it makes church songs unsingable to most people. Worst it was almost certainly not the
music those songs were written for !
We have no idea what those melodies sounded like of course, since David and his contemporaries didn’t have ANY notation.
We do know that no two cultures’ music sounds the same so we can almost certainly guarantee it didn’t sound like renaiscance western music.

So let’s try a thought experiment. We could try to guess how David’s songs might have sounded, by comparing it to modern day music with a similar lyrical structure. Ignore all gospel, there is no resemblence at all between modern gospel and the psalms. Structurally the psalms, particularly those of David find their closest contemporary paralels in rock balads. Rock balads themselves have a lot of
inspiration from minstrel balads of the middle ages, which it turns out were played on the later descendants of the same instruments that David used (particularly the lyre).
So if authenticity of worship (supposedly the prime protestant goal) was truly sought -we should be singing psalms to the acompiment of melodies more similar to “Low man’s lyric” or “Cold November Rain” than to the stuff we normally get !

Not that my point is to talk much about Church, or even to single out protestants that much, it’s just that I know them because it’s the church-culture I was raised in.

So what am I talking about ? Music as a universal. We’ve established that music sounds different for each culture, yet all people can recognize it as music. Why is this ?
Scientists have no fixed answers, but they believe that music is not handled by the speech centers of the brain (which is why lyrics are so often heard wrong, thousands of people love a song “This guys’s in love with you” which ACTUALLY goes “The sky’s in love with you”), it’s handled by something much deeper, the same rhythm centers that control other rhythmic things in our bodies - like heartbeat.
Music reaches right down into the soul, into the absolute lowest levels of our brains and triggers emotions from their most ancient “on” buttons. Music remains a human universal, because of this - because in a very real way even the most contemporary music will always be primitive, if it wasn’t, it wouldn’t BE music.


Whammy Bar

Filed under:AJ Venter, music, art, uncategorical — posted by AJ on @ 11:43 am

Music is quite possibly the most culturally universal thing on the planet. Every known culture has music. A lot of people have this idea that western music is “modern” and other cultures’ music is “primitive”, this is of course horse-figs. Music made in China or Tobega today is as contemporary as music made in the West today - they are both made today.

So Bach got it wrong when he used tribal music as the intro to “The rites of spring” to give it a “primitive feel”, the reality is that music he took inspiration from was just as contemporary as the music he was creating (for that time), this doesn’t change that he created one of the better symphonies, it does mean that what he intended to achieve with it was impossible in that way.

Music is a universal, but there is no universal music. Every culture has a different musical scale. Music notation as we know it, can in fact only be used to write down western music, and even then only those newer than the 1500’s or so.
This is because for starters, western music before that used completely different scales (which ones we don’t know for sure, but some of them like Gregorian chants still survive). And worse, it cannot even truly represent all western music since then.
A good example is guitars, notation can and does efficiently encode most known classical guitar pieces (with only a few exceptions like some Spanish balads that incorporate moments of using the guitar box as a percussion instrument - slapping it - in between the notes). Classic guitars however have only two ways they can be played, strumming or chords, both of which notation knows about.
Electric guitars on the other hand add several other techniques. For starters there’s “choking” (what Hendrix invented), where the guitar is played like usual, but the notes are pressed right up against the guitar-base - this doesn’t work on classical guitars because the notes would be too soft, but electric guitars have amps. Notation has now way of indicating -play this A right up against the head, yet it gives your songs a very different emotional feel.
And that’s not the worst of it.
Now try sliding, sliding is a technique where electric guitarists press the strings flat using a hollow object of some sort, a short metal pipe can work but beer-bottles are often employed. Sliding causes the slide-object to vibrate a note in harmony with the chords played - effectively you’re playing two instruments at once in harmony now - try writing notation for THAT one.
And that’s not even the most important electric guitar technique of all - what electric guitarists are most famous for is the “rapid strum” where the same note is played over and over so fast that it sounds like it lasts for a very long time, usually introducing a “howl” sound into the note.
Metal-players particularly love the howl as an emotive expression. But notation has no idea what to make of that, since no other instrument can be played that way, a a violin with a six meter bow would maybe come close.
So guitarists, especially rock-guitarists tend to prefer writing their songs down as riffs.



next page